How is M related to N? Statements : I. P, who has only two kids, M and N, is the mother-in-law of Q, who is sister-in-law of N. II. R, the sister-in-law of M, is the daughter-in-law of S, who has only two kids, M and N.

In the following question below are given two statements followed by two conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: I. All kids are cute II. No boy is cute Conclusions: I. All boy are kids II. No kids is boy

A

Only I follows

B

Only II follows

C

Both I and II follow

D

Neither I nor II follows

E

Either I or II follows

Two statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some kids are boys. All boys are men. Conclusions: I. Some kids are men. II. Some men are boys. III. No kids are men.

A

Only conclusions I and II follow.

B

Conclusion I and either conclusion II or III follow.

C

Only conclusions II and III follow.

D

Conclusion II and either conclusion I or III follow

In the given figure, the circle represents 'kids who can sing', the rectangle represents 'kids who can play', and the triangle represents 'kids who can dance'. Which part of the figure represents kids who can dance but CANNOT sing?

A

e

B

c

C

f

D

e and f

In the given figure, the circle represents 'kids who can write', the rectangle represents 'kids who can read', and the triangle represents 'kids who can sing'. Which part of the figure represents 'kids who can write but CANNOT sing'?

A

a, c

B

b, e

C

a, b, d, e

D

a, d

Below are given statements followed by some conclusions- You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to beat variance with the commonly known facts- Statements: 1) Some kids are clever. 2) Some kids are players. Conclusion: I. Some players are clever. II. Some clever kids are players. Decide which of the given conclusions logically follow (s) from the given statements-

A

Only conclusion I follows

B

Only conclusion II follows

C

Both conclusion I and II follows

D

Neither conclusion I nor II follows

Below are given statements followed by some conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with the commonly known facts.

Statements :
1) Some kids are clever.
2) Some kids are players. Conclusions :
1. Some players are clever.
2. Some clever kids are players. Decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(S) from the given statements.

A

Only conclusion 1 follows

B

Only conclusion 2 follows

C

Both conclusion 1 and 2 follows

D

Neither conclusion 1 nor 2 follows

Question : How is M related to N?

Statements :
I. P, who has only two kids, M and N, is the mother-in-law of Q, who is sister-in-law of N.
II. R, the sister-in-law of M, is the daughter-in-law of S, who has only two kids, M and N.

A

I alone is sufficient while II alone is not sufficient

B

II alone is sufficient while I alone is not sufficient

C

Either I or II is sufficient

D

Neither I nor II is sufficient

E

Both I and II are sufficient

Seven kids M, N, O, P, Q, R and S are standing in a row facing north. S is to the immediate right of P and to the immediate left of N. M is on the immediate right of O. M and P have one kid standing between them. Q and N have two Kids between them. P and R have also two kids standing between them. Who is exactly in the middle?

A

M

B

S

C

O

D

P

Out of 100 kids, 50 are members of Team X and 75 are members of Team Y. If 40 kids are members of both teams then how many of these 100 kids belong to neither of the two teams ?

A

10

B

40

C

35

D

15

the following question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if theyseem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement:
(I) Kids rejoice with toys and toys give them new opportunities to think in various ways.
(II) Toys are non-living things that create a virtual world around kids to think and perceive in various ways. Conclusions:
(I) If children don't play with toys some part of the personality is underdeveloped.
(II) Toys are mandatory and undetachable part of their personality.

A

Only conclusion II follows

B

Conclusion I and II both follow

C

Neither I nor II follow

D

Only conclusion I follows

How is M related to N? Statements : I. P, who has only two kids, M and N, is the mother-in-law of Q, who is sister-in-law of N. II. R, the sister-in-law of M, is the daughter-in-law of S, who has only two kids, M and N.

Related Questions