Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follow beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Give answer. Statement: This book 'Z' is the only book which focuses its attention to the problem of poverty in India between 1950 and 1980. Conclusions: I. There was no question of poverty before 1950. II. No other book deals with poverty in India during 1950 to 1980.

In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follow beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Give answer. Statement: This book 'Z' is the only book which focuses its attention to the problem of poverty in India between 1950 and 1980. Conclusions: I. There was no question of poverty before 1950. II. No other book deals with poverty in India during 1950 to 1980. Correct Answer Only conclusion II follows

With the help of phrase mentioned in the statement 'only book' we can conclude that there is no other book deals with poverty in India during 1950 to 1980. But, nothing about the state of poverty before 1950 can be deduced from the statement. So, I doesn’t follow.

Hence, only conclusion II follows.

Related Questions

Directions : In each of the following questions a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer :

Statements : This book 'Z' is the only book which focuses its attention to the problem of poverty in India between 1950 and 1980.

Conclusions :
I. There was no question of poverty before 1950.
II. No other book deals with poverty in India during 1950 to 1980.
In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Statement: Two-third of the students of standard VIII consisting of 53 boys and 17 girls know cycling. Conclusions: Girls  are poor cyclists Cycling is compulsory in this school.
In the question below, is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Give answer: (A) If only conclusion I follows (B) If only conclusion II follows (C) If either I or II follows (D) If both I and II follow. STATEMENT: Sun consists of huge amount of Helium. Sun is a typical midsize star. CONCLUSION 1: Most midsize stars will have at least some Helium. CONCLUSION 2: Large stars have more helium as compared to smaller stars.
In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follow beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Give answer. Statement: Death keeps no calendar. Conclusions: I. You can die only at night. II. Everyone has to die one day.
In the question below, a statement is given, followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Give answer. Statement: The singing reality shows have all good singers with good voices. Conclusions: I. Only singers with good voices are included in reality singing shows. II. All singers have good voices.
In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follow beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Give answer. Statement: Quality of food in the restaurants of Shalimar Bagh is best in Delhi. Conclusions: I. Ambience of restaurants of Shalimar bagh is better than any other place. II. The restaurants of Shalimar Bagh are most expensive in the city.
In the question below, is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Give answer: (A) If only conclusion I follows (B) If only conclusion II follows (C) If either I or II follows (D) If both I and II follow. STATEMENT: LED bulbs are preferred over incandescent bulbs. CONCLUSION 1: They provide more brightness. CONCLUSION 2: They are more eco-friendly.
In the question below, is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Give answer: (A) If only conclusion I follows (B) If only conclusion II follows (C) If either I or II follows (D) If both I and II follow. STATEMENT : Helium is inert by nature. CONCLUSION 1: It is used in weather balloons. CONCLUSION 2: It is used in tube lights.
In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follow beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Give answer. Statement: The officer insulted Rajeev in the presence of his colleagues. Conclusions: I. The officer did not like Rajeev. II. Rajeev was not well-known with his colleagues.
In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follow beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Give answer. Statement: Chicago is the most expensive city. Conclusions: I. Singapore is less expensive than Chicago. II. Angola is more expensive than Singapore.