Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Which of the following deal with the conflict between Fundamental Rights (FRs) and Directive Principles (DPSPs)? 1) Champakam Dorairajan case (1951) 2) Bommai case (1978) 3) 42nd Amendment Act (1976) 4) Minerva Mills case (1980)

Which of the following deal with the conflict between Fundamental Rights (FRs) and Directive Principles (DPSPs)? 1) Champakam Dorairajan case (1951) 2) Bommai case (1978) 3) 42nd Amendment Act (1976) 4) Minerva Mills case (1980) Correct Answer 1, 3, 4

First, third and fourth option deal with the conflict between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles while 2nd  option deals with imposition of President's rule under Article 356. 
Case Related to
Champakam Dorairajan case (1951) Fundamental Rights would prevail in case of any conflict between Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles of State policy.
42nd Amendment Act (1976) 42nd Amendment Act of 1976 added four new Directive Principles to the original list.
Minerva Mills case (1980) Stated the balance between the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles.
Bommai case (1978) In Bommai case (1994), propositions have been laid down by the Supreme Court on the imposition of President’s Rule in a state under Article 356.

 

Related Questions

Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the Directive Principles of the State Policy? A. In case of a conflict between the Directive Principles and Fundamental Rights, the Directive Principles shall prevail in the court. B. Fundamental rights are not unlimited and citizens are subject to reasonable restrictions. The Directive Principles are subject to any constitutional limitations.
Which of the following statement/s about Fundamental Duties is/are not correct? (i) The Fundamental Duties are incorporated in Article 51A (Part IVA) of Constitution. (ii) The Fundamental Duties were inserted in the Constitution by the 42nd Constitution Amendment Act, 1976. (iii) The Fundamental Duties have to be fulfilled by every person living in India. (iv) The eleventh Fundamental Duty was added by the 86th Constitution Amendment Act, 2006. Choose the correct answer from the code given below :
The question below consists of a set of labelled sentences. These sentences, when properly sequenced form a coherent paragraph. Select the most logical order of sentences from among the options. P: These features demonstrate the legal superiority of the Fundamental Rights over Directive Principles. Q: Fundamental Rights are enforceable. R: These stand granted and guaranteed. S: As against these Directive Principles are non-enforceable principles which have been incorporated in the Constitution after the incorporation of the Fundamental Rights.
Whereas the 25th Amendment gave primacy to Directive Principles of State Policy contained in Article 39(b) and (c) over the Fundamental Rights in Articles 14, 19 or 31 of the Constitution of India, the 42nd Amendment gave precedence to all Directive Principles over the Fundamental Rights guaranteed in
Which of the following cases were related to fundamental rights– 1. First Constitution Amendment, 1951 2. Minerwa Mills Vs. Union of India, 1980 3. Shankari Prasad Vs. Union of India, 1951 4. Keshawa Nand Bharti Vs. State of Kerala, 1973
Which of the following statement/s about Fundamental Duties is/are not correct?
1. The Fundamental Duties are incorporated in Article 51A (part IVA) of Consitution.
2. The Fundamental Duties are inserted in the Constitution by the 42nd Constitution Amendment Act, 1976.
3. The Fundamental Duties have to be fulfilled by every person living in India.
4. The eleventh Fundamental Duty was added by the 86th Constitution Amendment Act, 2006.
Choose the correct answer:
The question below consists of a set of labelled sentences. These sentences, when properly sequenced form a coherent paragraph. Select the most logical order of sentences from among the options. P: These features clearly bring out the nature of the Indian Bill of Rights. Q: The Constitution grants and guarantees fundamental rights and freedom to all the people of India and constitute a vital pillar of Indian Democracy. R: No Law can violate the Fundamental Rights of the People of India. S: The fundamental rights incorporated in the Constitution stand at a higher pedestal than ordinary laws and the Directive Principles of State Policy.
Assertion (A): In Minerva Mills v. Union of India Article 31C as amended by the Constitution (forty second Amendment) Act, 1976 was held invalid.
Reason (R): The amendment of Article 31C destroyed the basic structure of the Constitution.
In which of the following cases Directive Principles were not allowed to be harmoniously construed with Fundamental rights, and Fundamental Rights were clearly declared to be superior to the Directive Principles?
Which of the following statement is/are correct Fundamental Rights enjoy legal supremacy over Directive principles. The Parliament can amend the Fundamental Rights for implementing the Directive Principles. Choose the correct option given below