Which of the following conclusions are most obvious in relation to the statement given below: Statement: Vehicular source contributes 60% to the total pollution level of Delhi, as informed in the Rajya Sabha today. Conclusion: I.  The court has ordered that the main source of pollution should be identified. II.  The problem of pollution is high on the worklist III. In the other cities also, vehicular source contributes around the same percentage level of pollution. IV. This matter was first raised in the Lok Sabha. V.  Not many towns in India face the problem of pollution.

Which of the following conclusions are most obvious in relation to the statement given below: Statement: Vehicular source contributes 60% to the total pollution level of Delhi, as informed in the Rajya Sabha today. Conclusion: I.  The court has ordered that the main source of pollution should be identified. II.  The problem of pollution is high on the worklist III. In the other cities also, vehicular source contributes around the same percentage level of pollution. IV. This matter was first raised in the Lok Sabha. V.  Not many towns in India face the problem of pollution. Correct Answer Only II

The logic follows here is:

Conclusion True/False
I) The court has ordered that the main source of pollution should be identified. False. As there is nothing mentioned in the statement about the ordered pass by the court.
II) The problem of pollution is high on the worklist True. As statement talks about the high level of pollution in Delhi.
III) In the other cities also, vehicular source contributes around the same percentage level of pollution False. As there is nothing mentioned about the vehicular pollution in other cities.
IV) This matter was first raised in the Lok Sabha False. A statement does not give any idea about where the matter was raised first.
V) Not many towns in India face the problem of pollution False. As there is nothing mentioned about the vehicular pollution in other towns of India.

Therefore, Only conclusion II follows.

Hence, the correct answer is "Only II".

Related Questions

In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow (s) for pursuing. Statement: With one year to go for 2019 parliamentary elections, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has stepped in to ensure results can be seen on the ground. The Centre has asked states to focus on impactful and public-private-partnership based smart city projects, which would show results over the next one year and have a review mechanism in place. Ministry of housing and urban affairs, the nodal ministry for Smart Cities Mission has identified 261 impactful ventures worth Rs. 31,000 crore and PPP projects worth Rs. 32,000 crore for the states to work on. Courses of Action: I. The move follows directives from the Prime Minister. During a review of Smart Cities mission last week, PM Modi had emphasized on early implementation of projects and suggested that the chief secretaries of all states should review the progress of the implementation. II. These identified projects account for an investment of Rs. 31,112 crore. The states have also been asked to work on 370 PPP projects that involve an investment of Rs. 32,410 crore The impactful projects identified range from building 40 outdoor fitness centres in New Delhi Municipal Council area at a cost of Rs. 1.31 crore to redevelopment of 340 acre area in Bhopal at a cost of Rs. 3,000 crore.  III. Secretary (housing and urban affairs) D. S. Mishra has written to chief secretaries of states and asked them to focus on the belated implementation of smart city projects that have a visible and transformative impact in the lives of citizens in identified smart cities.
In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: Soon VAT 69 whiskey and Smirnoff Vodka will not be found on the shelves of Delhi Liquor stores owing to the duplication of barcode by manufacturer United Limited. The Delhi government financial commissioner blacklisted the manufacturer. Financial commissioner Anindo Majumdar had said in an order dated September 14, that USL had violated provisions of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009 and Delhi Excise Rules, 2010 by using unauthorized and loose barcodes, which could be easily misused. Courses of action: I. The ban will force United Spirits Limited not to sell its liquor in the national capital for two years. II. the appellant violated provisions of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009, Delhi Excise Rules, 2010, the terms and conditions of the license issued to it and the standard operating procedure framed by the Delhi Excise Department and that consequently the department has rightly imposed the penalty of blacklisting under Rule 70 of the Delhi Excise Rules, 2010 upon United Spirits LTD (USL), Aurangabad. III. United Limited has been blacklisted by the Delhi government financial commissioner.