For a positive integer n, by using Chinese Remainder Theorem, the number of solutions of the congruence x2 ≡ 1 (mod n), when e ≥ 3 is:

For a positive integer n, by using Chinese Remainder Theorem, the number of solutions of the congruence x2 ≡ 1 (mod n), when e ≥ 3 is: Correct Answer 2<sup>k + 2</sup>

Concept:

By the Chinese Remainder theorem, the number of solution of x2 ≡ 1 (mod pk) is 2k+1.

Calculation:

As we have given x2 ≡ 1 (mod n)

The above congruence means x2 - 1 is divisible by n.

⇒ n | x2 - 1

or n | (x - 1) (x + 1)

Case I, when n = 1;

When n = 1 then there is only two solutions of x2 ≡ 1 (mod n).

Then,

⇒ 1 | (x - 1)(x + 1) 

so, there are two solutions to the above.

Case II, when n > 1;

Let, n = pk as any number can be written in the form of the product of prime numbers.

Then above congruence can be written as

⇒ x2 ≡ 1 (mod pk)

The above-given congruence has a 2k+1 number of solution, by the Chinese Remainder theorem.

Therefore, there is a total  2k+2 solution of the above congruence relation, 2 solutions for n = 1 and  2k+1 number of solution for n > 1.

Hence, the number of solution of the congruence is 2k+2.

Related Questions

Necessary condition to apply the Chinese remainder theorem is modulo of congruence should be:
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: As a trade war looms, one of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s biggest weapons could be boycotts of American brands by his country’s legion of consumers. But Xi would also be risking collateral damage at home, The China operations of all-American brands ranging from Coca-Cola Co. and McDonald’s Corp. to Walt Disney Co. are co-owned by state-backed Chinese firms.  Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner? Arguments: I. One of Coke’s main China partners is government-backed COFCO Corp., Shanghai Disneyland is part owned by a local consortium, and McDonald’s franchisee in the country is controlled by state-backed conglomerate Citic Ltd. and private-equity firm Citic Capital Holdings.  II. Even when Chinese companies don’t have direct ownership links with U.S. brands, boycotts or other non-tariff retaliation would hit the local partners of those American companies. III. The number of big clean wins in terms of striking against the other guy (American brands) - without accidentally punching your own guy (Chinese firms) in the face - is extremely large.