Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Statement: Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has revealed during an interview that a direct clash between the US and Russia in Syria was narrowly avoided "by the wisdom of the Russian leadership".  Which of the following objection(s) might be a probable reason(s) for such a revelation by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad? I. Adding that Syria needs Russian support, Assad said, "At the same time we need to avoid the American foolishness in order to be able to stabilise our country". II. Adding that Syria needs American support, Assad said, "At the same time we need to avoid the American foolishness in order to be able to stabilise our country". III. Adding that Syria needs Russian support, Assad said, "At the same time we need to avoid the Russian foolishness in order to be able to stabilise our country". IV. Adding that Syria needs American support, Assad said, "At the same time we need to avoid the Russian foolishness in order to be able to stabilise our country".

Statement: Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has revealed during an interview that a direct clash between the US and Russia in Syria was narrowly avoided "by the wisdom of the Russian leadership".  Which of the following objection(s) might be a probable reason(s) for such a revelation by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad? I. Adding that Syria needs Russian support, Assad said, "At the same time we need to avoid the American foolishness in order to be able to stabilise our country". II. Adding that Syria needs American support, Assad said, "At the same time we need to avoid the American foolishness in order to be able to stabilise our country". III. Adding that Syria needs Russian support, Assad said, "At the same time we need to avoid the Russian foolishness in order to be able to stabilise our country". IV. Adding that Syria needs American support, Assad said, "At the same time we need to avoid the Russian foolishness in order to be able to stabilise our country". Correct Answer Only I

The correct answer is option 2, i.e. Only I.

From the statement, we get the idea that the Syrian President is praising Russia for its wisdom which helped in avoiding the clash. Thus, from the options, we must focus that Syria needs Russian support and at the same time must avoid the foolishness of the US, in order to avoid any more clash. Thus, the most appropriate answer is option 2 and the rest of the options can be eliminated.

Since the options are very close, effective reading of the statement and proper scanning of all the option choices is very important to mark the right answer choice.

Related Questions

A statement is givenfollowed by three inferences numberedI, II, and III. Consider the statement tobe true even if it is at variance withcommonly known facts. You have todecide which of the inferences, if any,follow from the given statement. Statement: Donald Trump began theweek facing accusations of treason overhis embrace of Vladimir Putin and endedit with a middle finger to his many criticsby inviting the Russian autocrat to theWhite House. Inferences: I. America and Russia are not allies.
II. No prior American President has ever
embraced a Russian counterpart.
III. Russian President, Vladimir Putin,
has been a long-time US enemy.
Bashar is twice as fast as Arif and Karim is three times as fast as Arif. If Bashar alone can complete a job in 12 days, how long will Bashar, Arif and Karim take to complete the same job together ?
Read the question below followed by two statements. Study them and decide which statement(s) is/are sufficient to answer the question. Question: A, B, C, D, E and F have interviews on different days of a week from Monday to Saturday but not necessarily in the same order. Who has an interview on Tuesday? Statements: I) D has an interview just before E. Two persons have interviews between D’s and F’s interviews. II) C has an interview on Friday. B has an interview two days before D.
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: India has conveyed to Russia that it will not be a part of the project now to develop a fifth-generation fighter aircraft (FGFA) and may join the programme at a later stage, according to Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman. It was conveyed to Russia that they can go ahead with the project and we may join it at a later stage.Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner? Arguments: I. India and Russia had signed an inter-governmental agreement for the mega project in 2007, vowing to take the military ties between the two strategic partners to the next level. II. However, the project has been stuck for the last 11 years as there have been serious differences between the two sides on sharing cost of developing the jet, technologies to be used in it and number of aircraft to be produced. III. The government is adopting a layered approach to achieve the final goal of theatre command and that the thrust was on a bottom-up approach.
Principle: A manufacturer is liable to pay compensation to a consumer for any harm or damage caused due to a defect in the product.
Factual Situation: X purchased a banian from Y & Co. Before rushing for an interview he wore the new banian. When he was called in for the interview his entire body was itching. Throughout the interview he was embarrassed as he was repeatedly scratching his body. After the interview he rushed to a dermatologist, who diagnosed it as dermatitis due to the presence of some chemical present in the banian. The Doctor brought to his attention a warning strip in the banian "Wash before use". He obviously lost the job due to his clumsy behaviour at the interview. X sues Y & Co. for compensation.
Bashar al-Assad, president of Syria
Which one of the following four addresses is NOT EXACTLY same as the one given below? Christine Smith 6, Kutuzovskaya st., Platforma Kutuzovskaya, Podolsk, Moscow region, Russia (i) Christine Smith 6, Kutuzovskaya st., Platforma Kutuzovskava, Podolsk, Moscow region, Russia (ii) Christine Smith 6, Kutuzovskaya st., Platforma Kutuzovskaya, Podolsk, Moscow region, Russia (iii) Christine Smith 6, Kutuzovskaya st., Platforma Kutuzovskaya, Podolsk, Moscow region, Russia (iv) Christine Smith 6, Kutuzovskaya st., Platforma Kutuzovskaya, Podolsk, Moscow region, Russia
Which of the following statements are true/false?
1. Informal interview comprises of an interviewer or a manager from HR Department asking casual questions such as name, previous experience etc.
2. Stress interview is intended to test the applicant and his conduct, behaviour in a stressful situation.
3. Depth interview is conducted to examine the candidates background and thinking and to go in detail about his special interest.
4. Planned interview is also informal in nature.
Statement is followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statement: The Russian government welcomed India’s decision to participate in the talks. “We highly regard Indian support in the peace process in Afghanistan and welcome Indian readiness and that of other partner countries in the Moscow format,” the Russian Embassy said in a statement on Thursday. Conclusion.- 1. India and Russian Government have participated in many peace talks together. 2. Participation in peace talk is going to help India in future businesses with Russia and Afghanistan 3. All partner countries have strong economic ties.
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: As a trade war looms, one of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s biggest weapons could be boycotts of American brands by his country’s legion of consumers. But Xi would also be risking collateral damage at home, The China operations of all-American brands ranging from Coca-Cola Co. and McDonald’s Corp. to Walt Disney Co. are co-owned by state-backed Chinese firms.  Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner? Arguments: I. One of Coke’s main China partners is government-backed COFCO Corp., Shanghai Disneyland is part owned by a local consortium, and McDonald’s franchisee in the country is controlled by state-backed conglomerate Citic Ltd. and private-equity firm Citic Capital Holdings.  II. Even when Chinese companies don’t have direct ownership links with U.S. brands, boycotts or other non-tariff retaliation would hit the local partners of those American companies. III. The number of big clean wins in terms of striking against the other guy (American brands) - without accidentally punching your own guy (Chinese firms) in the face - is extremely large.