Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

In the question, two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statements: I. No rubbers are plastic II. AII polymers are rubber Conclusions: I. Some plastic are polymers II. No polymers are plastic

In the question, two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statements: I. No rubbers are plastic II. AII polymers are rubber Conclusions: I. Some plastic are polymers II. No polymers are plastic Correct Answer Only conclusion II follows

The least possible Venn diagram for the given statements is as follows

[ alt="SSC CHSL 10 March 2018 Shift2 D6" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/18/08/SSC_CHSL_10_March_2018_Shift2_D6.PNG" style="height:115px; width:310px">

I: Some plastic are polymers → False

II: No polymers are plastic → True

Thus, only conclusion II follows.

Related Questions

In the question, two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: No plastics are polymers. Statement II: Some rubbers are plastics. Conclusion I: Some polymers are rubbers. Conclusion II: All rubbers are polymers.
In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: No rubber are plastic Statement II: All polymers are rubber Conclusion I: Some plastic are polymers Conclusion II: No polymers are plastic
Given below are two statements, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seems to be a variance with commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follow(s) from the given statements. Statement I: All polymers are plastic. Statement 2: No rubber is plastic Conclusion I: Some polymers are rubber Conclusion II: Some plastics are polymer. Conclusion III: No polymer is rubber.
In the question below are given three statements followed by four conclusions I, II, III and IV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some bat are ball. No ball is plastic. Some plastic are gold. Conclusions: I. At least some Ball are plastic. II. All Plastic are gold.
In each of the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusion, Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements, seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements, Statements: I. All pages are yellow. II. All yellow are newspapers. III. Some newspapers are national. Conclusions: I. Some national are yellow II. Some newspapers are pages. III. No page is national.
In the following question below some statements are given followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows the given statements. Statement: I. Some pen is pencil. II. Some rubber is pen. Conclusion: I. No pen is rubber. II. Some pencil is rubber.
In the question given below are some statements followed by some conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some fairs are rounds. Some rounds are biased. Some biased are dark. Conclusions: I. Some dark are rounds. II. Some fairs are dark.
Read the passage carefully and select the best answer to each question out of the given four alternatives.
The Amazon basin has been continuously inhabited for at least 10, 000 years, possibly more. Its earliest inhabitants were stone-age peoples, living in hundreds of far-flung tribes, some tiny, others numbering in the tens of thousands. It was from the west that Europeans explorers first arrived. In 1541 a Spanish expedition from Quito, led by Gonzalo Pizarro, ran short of supplies while exploring east of the Andes in what is today Peru. Pizarros cousin Francisco de Orellana offered to take 60 men along with the boats from the expedition and forage for supplies. De Orellana floated down the Rio Napo to its confluence with the Amazon, near Iquitos (Peru), and then to the mouth of the Amazon. Along the way his expedition suffered numerous attacks by Indians; some of the Indian warriors, they reported, were female, like the Amazons of Greek mythology, and thus the worlds greatest river got its name. No one made a serious effort to claim this sweaty territory, however, until the Portuguese built a fort near the mouth of the river at Belém in 1616, and sent Pedro Teixeira up the river to Quito and back between 1637 and 1639. During the 17th and 18th centuries, Portuguese bandeirantes (groups of roaming adventurers) penetrated ever further into the rain forest in pursuit of gold and Indian slaves, exploring as far as present-day Rondônia, and the Guaporé and Madeira river valleys. Amazonian Indians had long used the sap from rubber trees to make waterproof bags and other items. European explorers recognized the potential value of natural latex, but were unable to market it because it tended to grow soft in the heat, or brittle in the cold, and thus had limited appeal outside the rain forest. However, in 1842 American Charles Goodyear developed vulcanization (made natural rubber durable) and in 1890 Irelands John Dunlop patented pneumatic rubber tires. Soon there was an unquenchable demand for rubber in the recently industrialized USA and Europe, and the price of rubber on international markets soared. As profits skyrocketed, so did exploitation of the seringueiros, or rubber tappers, who were lured into the Amazon, mostly from the drought-stricken northeast, by the promise of prosperity only to be locked into a cruel system of virtual slavery dominated by seringalistas (owners of rubber-bearing forests). Rigged scales, hired guns, widespread illiteracy among the rubber tappers, and monopoly of sales and purchases all combined to perpetuate the workers debt and misery. In addition, seringueiros had to contend with jungle fevers, Indian attacks and all manner of deprivation.
Who among the following patented the pneumatic rubber tires?
In the question, two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement: Around 79% of the total rubber usage is by the tyre industry. Conclusions: I: Rubber is used in manufacturing tyres. II: Tyres are used in vehicles.
In the question below are given four statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Adidas are Lava. Some Lava are Iron. Some Iron are Samsung. Some Samsung are Rod. Conclusions: I. Some Lava are Adidas. II. Some Samsung are Lava.