In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: No umbrellas are raincoats Statement II: Some jackets are umbrellas Conclusion I: All raincoats are jackets Conclusion II: All jackets are raincoats

In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: No umbrellas are raincoats Statement II: Some jackets are umbrellas Conclusion I: All raincoats are jackets Conclusion II: All jackets are raincoats Correct Answer Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows

The least possible Venn diagram for the given statements is as follows

[ alt="01.8.2018.019" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/18/08/01.8.2018.019.PNG">

I. All raincoats are Jackets → False.(it is possible but not definite)

II. All jackets are raincoats → False (Some jackets are umbrellas and No umbrellas are raincoats)

Hence, neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows.

Related Questions