In the following question, a given question is followed by information in two statements. You have to decide the data in which statement (s) is sufficient to answer the question and mark your answer accordingly. Amita, Priya, Sebastian, Trisha, Mauli, Jovita and Angelin have their flights to be departed from different airports such as Mumbai airport, Delhi airport, Chandigarh airport, Bangalore airport, Assam airport, Chennai airport and Amritsar airport. From which airport does Jovita’s flight depart? I. Trisha’s flight is from Assam airport. Mauli and Priya do not have their flights from Amritsar. Angelin’s flight is not from Chennai airport. II. Amita’s flight is from Bangalore airport. Jovita’s flight is not from Mumbai airport. Sebastian’s flight is departing from Delhi airport.

In the following question, a given question is followed by information in two statements. You have to decide the data in which statement (s) is sufficient to answer the question and mark your answer accordingly. Amita, Priya, Sebastian, Trisha, Mauli, Jovita and Angelin have their flights to be departed from different airports such as Mumbai airport, Delhi airport, Chandigarh airport, Bangalore airport, Assam airport, Chennai airport and Amritsar airport. From which airport does Jovita’s flight depart? I. Trisha’s flight is from Assam airport. Mauli and Priya do not have their flights from Amritsar. Angelin’s flight is not from Chennai airport. II. Amita’s flight is from Bangalore airport. Jovita’s flight is not from Mumbai airport. Sebastian’s flight is departing from Delhi airport. Correct Answer Neither statement I nor statement II is sufficient to answer the question.

Amita, Priya, Sebastian, Trisha, Mauli, Jovita and Angelin have their flights to be departed from different airports such as Mumbai airport, Delhi airport, Chandigarh airport, Bangalore airport, Assam airport, Chennai airport and Amritsar airport.

I. Trisha’s flight is from Assam airport. Mauli and Priya do not have their flights from Amritsar. Angelin’s flight is not from Chennai airport.

Names

Airport

Amita

 

Priya

Amritsar

Sebastian

 

Trisha

Assam

Mauli

Amritsar

Jovita

 

Angelin

Chennai

 

II. Amita’s flight is from Bangalore airport. Jovita’s flight is not from Mumbai airport. Sebastian’s flight is departing from Delhi airport.

Names

Airport

Amita

Bangalore

Priya

 

Sebastian

Delhi

Trisha

 

Mauli

 

Jovita

Mumbai

Angelin

 

 

Combining statements I and II we get,

I. Trisha’s flight is from Assam airport. Mauli and Priya do not have their flights from Amritsar. Angelin’s flight is not from Chennai airport.

II. Amita’s flight is from Bangalore airport. Jovita’s flight is not from Mumbai airport. Sebastian’s flight is departing from Delhi airport.

Names

Airport

Amita

Bangalore

Priya

Amritsar

Sebastian

Delhi

Trisha

Assam

Mauli

Amritsar

Jovita

Mumbai

Angelin

Chennai

 

The airport from which the flight of Jovita will depart cannot be determined from any of the statements.

Thus, “Neither statement I nor statement II is sufficient to answer the question.”

Related Questions

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: India’s telecom watchdog has suggested regulation of all entities dealing with consumer data—devices such as iPhones, operating systems such as Android, browsers like Google’s Chrome and apps such as Facebook, Paytm, Uber or Zomato— by bringing them under licence conditions that apply to telecom service providers until a general data protection law is put in place by the government. Which of the following argument weakens the above statement in the best possible manner? Arguments: I. The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) said the framework for protection of personal information is ‘not sufficient’ and that the issue of data ownership, privacy, and security is complex and multi-dimensional. It suggested expanding the ambit of licence conditions governing telcos to all entities handling customer information and empowerment of customers to keep their data secure. II. The telecom watchdog further said that individual users owned their data, or personal information, and entities such as devices were ‘mere custodians’ and do not have primary rights over that information. III. Telcos and internet service providers (ISPs) though welcomed recommendations that sought to bring app makers under the same regulations. However, content providers have been opposed to being brought under more regulation.