In the question, two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from the commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: Some pizzas are pancakes. Statement II: All bread are pizzas. Conclusion I: All pancakes are bread. Conclusion II: No bread is a pizza.
In the question, two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from the commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: Some pizzas are pancakes. Statement II: All bread are pizzas. Conclusion I: All pancakes are bread. Conclusion II: No bread is a pizza. Correct Answer Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows
[ alt="SSC CHSL 07 March 2018 1.PNG 2" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/18/12/SSC_CHSL_07_March_2018_1.PNG_2.PNG">
Conclusion I: All pancakes are bread → False (It is possible but not definite)
Conclusion II: No bread is a pizza. → False (All bread are pizzas)
Hence, ‘neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows’.