Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Consider the given statement to be true and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statement: Farmers protested against the government demanding a minimum support price for crops. Conclusions: 1. The government should give farmers the money to stop the protest. 2. The government should give them a minimum support price for their crops.

Consider the given statement to be true and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statement: Farmers protested against the government demanding a minimum support price for crops. Conclusions: 1. The government should give farmers the money to stop the protest. 2. The government should give them a minimum support price for their crops. Correct Answer Only conclusion 2 follows.

Conclusion 1: Farmers are protesting for minimum support price, not for money. So, giving money to the farmers is not going to stop the protest. So, conclusion 1 does not follow.

Conclusion 2: Protest can stop only if the government gives the farmers the minimum support price for their crops. So, the government should give them minimum support price to stop the protest. So, conclusion 2 follows.

Related Questions

P, Q, R, Sand T are five crops that Babu grows. T is fast growing and more water demanding than R which gives more yield than T. P gives more yield than R and grows faster than Q. Q is more water demanding than T but is second lowest yielder, S is the slowest growing and least water demanding of all crops but gives highest yield. R is more water demanding and grows faster than P. Select the crop or crops that has/ have as many as crops that are more water demanding and as many as crops that give less yield than it. 
Two statements are followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. Milk supply in Maharashtra was badly hit after thousands of dairy farmers launched a protest on Monday, demanding better price and subsidy of Rs 5 per litre. Tankers supplying milk to major cities including Mumbai, Pune, Nagpur, Nashik and others were blocked early morning leading to sudden crisis.  II. The agriculture ministry had mooted a proposal asking railways to make milk available at railway stations and at the meeting, sources said representatives from Amul India suggested that the national transporter could provide stalls to dairy companies or cooperatives where they could sell their products.  Conclusions: I. Representatives of Amul India and food safety body FSSAI are willing to discuss issues and concerns of the dairy sector in the backdrop of the farmers agitation in Maharashtra that had led to severe shortage of milk in the state.  II. The farmers' groups and Maharashtra Kisan Sabha, are demanding a GST waiver on butter and milk powder apart from the subsidy. III. Railways is drawing up a plan to make milk available at railway stations across the country to promote its consumption.
Two statements are followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. Political parties that opposed simultaneous polls before the Law Commission mostly cited federalism, Constitution and impracticability for their opposition, but Goa Forward Party chose coconuts to drive home its point against the proposal of ‘One Nation, One Election'. II. The regional party that is part of the BJP-led Goa government cited coconut, its party symbol, to argue that regional issues will go unaddressed in the noise of simultaneous polls. Conclusions: I. To buttress its reasoning, Goa Forward Party representative cited the party's history and struggle in protesting against cutting down of coconut trees in Goa before it came to power with ally BJP in March 2017. II. The party had protested against the BJP government's decision to amend rules to simplify the procedure of cutting down coconut trees by removing it from the list of trees. III. The commission held talks with political parties on the proposal of simultaneous elections.
In this question, two statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered i and ii. You have to assume everything in the statements to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statements. Statements: Some nibs are pens. All pens are spoons. Conclusions: i) Some spoons are nibs. ii) All spoons are pens. Choose the appropriate one from the following options A) Only conclusion i follows B) Only conclusion ii follows C) Either i or ii follows D) Neither i nor ii follows and
In the question below, a passage is given followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Passage: After a certain group of civil activists have filed a complaint against two mammoth flats in Kochi which were illegally built near to a river, breaching all kinds of environmental guidelines, the Supreme Court has ordered that the flats be demolished. Flat owners have since gone on a protest demanding that their homes should not be destroyed. Courses of action: I. The Government should not demolish the flats. II. The Government should demolish the flats and pay compensation equivalent to the market value of the flats to flat owners. III. Action should be taken against the builders and the government officials who gave the permit for construction.
In the question below are given two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Statements: 1. In the past ten years, chapters have been reduced in order to reduce the pressure on students. 2. One of the ways to eliminate frustration and depression from a student’s life is by reducing the syllabus. Conclusions: I. Students nowadays are happy and ignorant to studies. II. Burden of huge syllabus is one of the main reasons for hypertension among school students. Find which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
In this question, a statement is given followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. You have to take the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given sequence of action is to be taken logically. Statement: Farmers are unable to sell their products due to low demand. Course of action: I: The government should buy products from farmers at a price below the cost price and export them at a higher price. II: Government should not interfere in this situation as it will cause trouble to the farmers.
In this question, a statement is given followed by two conclusions numbered i and ii. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Statement: "The MT pen costs Rs.25 per piece", read a board in a stationery shop. Conclusion: i) The cost of 5 MT pens is Rs. 125. ii) The cost of the pen is very high Choose the appropriate one from the following options A) Only conclusion i follows B) Only conclusion ii follows C) Either i or ii follows D) Neither i nor ii follows and E) Both i and ii follow
In each of the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusion, Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements, seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements, Statements: I. All pages are yellow. II. All yellow are newspapers. III. Some newspapers are national. Conclusions: I. Some national are yellow II. Some newspapers are pages. III. No page is national.
In the following question below some statements are given followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows the given statements. Statements: All real are virtual. No virtual is fake. Conclusions: I. No real is fake. II. Some virtual are real. A. Only conclusion I follows B. Only conclusion II follows C. Either I or II follows D. Both I and II follow