Since the last one year, after a 125 basis point reduction in repo rate by the Reserve Bank of India, banking institutions have been making a demand to reduce interest rates on small saving schemes. Finally, the government announced yesterday a reduction in interest rates on small saving schemes to bring them on par with fixed deposit interest rates. Which one of the following statements can be inferred from the given passage?

Since the last one year, after a 125 basis point reduction in repo rate by the Reserve Bank of India, banking institutions have been making a demand to reduce interest rates on small saving schemes. Finally, the government announced yesterday a reduction in interest rates on small saving schemes to bring them on par with fixed deposit interest rates. Which one of the following statements can be inferred from the given passage? Correct Answer The government sometimes takes into consideration the demands of banking institutions before reducing the interest rates on small saving schemes.

The correct answer is 'The government sometimes takes into consideration the demands of banking institutions before reducing the interest rates on small saving schemes.'

Key Points

  • Option 1 is incorrect as the statement says that the banking institutions had been demanding the reduction 'since the last one year' before it was fulfilled, implying that it is not something that happens usually. Hence, it cannot be said that whenever the Reserve Bank of India reduces the repo rate, the interest rates on small saving schemes are also reduced.
  • Option 2 is incorrect. The phrase 'to bring them on par with fixed deposit interest rates' in the statement implies that the interest rates on small saving schemes are not always maintained on par with fixed deposit interest rates.
  • Option 4 is incorrect as there is no information provided in the statement to support this inference. 
  • Option 3 is the correct answer.

Related Questions

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: A shortage of bank branches and ATMs across India’s hinterland is holding back Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s financial inclusion efforts and risks angering rural voters ahead of elections next year. After taking office in 2014, Modi set an ambitious target to open a bank account for every household to ensure welfare funds flow directly to India’s poor, while improving access to credit and insurance programs. He pushed policies that helped bring 310 million people into the formal banking system in just four years, according to the World Bank. Based on the arguments stated below and he information stated above, which of the following arguments state the reason for the problem, ‘But many of India’s villages still lack bank branches or ATMs to help service new customers, while the pace of building new financial infrastructure has actually slowed’.  Arguments: I. Because Modi’s government effectively forced poor citizens into the banking system by linking some welfare benefits to bank accounts, villagers have ended up stuck in long queues and struggling with ATMs that often run out of cash or break down.  II. With an election due next year, the mismatch between the government’s policies and the rural banking system is generating frustration among a key slice of India’s electorate. III. The banking system struggled to keep up, while some gains proved temporary. Nearly half of Indian bank accounts were inactive in 2017, meaning they weren’t used at all in the previous 12 months
In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: In a bid to find a successor to founder CEO Rana Kapoor, The Yes Bank has formed a five member panel including two members from outside the bank, less than a week after Reserve Bank of India (RBI) cut short his tenure until January 31 2019. In a press release sent to the exchanges late on Tuesday evening, Yes Bank said that the “search and selection committee” would comprise of three members of the bank’s nomination and remuneration committee and also two external members, which the bank did not specify.  Courses of action: I. However, the board has requested the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to grant an extension to Kapoor up to September 2019 ‘for finalization of audited financial statements for fiscal year ending March 2019 and in order for the statutory AGM process to be completed’. II. The board has also recommended the elevation of senior group presidents Rajat Monga and Pralay Mondal as executive directors ‘to ensure a long term succession plan within Yes Bank, and given the demonstrated track record of these two senior leaders’. All this will be subject to RBI approval.  III. The panel will comprise of five members and will focus on find a successor to Rana Kapoor.
After GST and demonetisation, rising interest rates are set to hurt SMEs. Interest rates for loans against property (LAP) extended to small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) are set to rise in the coming months of 2018 ‘ Rising interest rates, in addition to the muted operating environment for small businesses in India, will lead to an increase in delinquencies on LAP extended to SMEs’. The introduction of the goods and services tax (GST) in July 2017 and the government's demonetization policy have placed stress on the SME sector, which rising interest rates will exacerbate. Which of the following can be logically inferred from the statement above?