In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I : Some Mugs are Coins. Statement II : All Coins are Drones. Conclusion I : No Drones are Mugs. Conclusion II : All Mugs being Drones is a possibility.

In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I : Some Mugs are Coins. Statement II : All Coins are Drones. Conclusion I : No Drones are Mugs. Conclusion II : All Mugs being Drones is a possibility. Correct Answer Only conclusion II follows.

The least possible Venn diagram is as follows:

[ alt="F2 Puja Tiwari 2.7.21 Pallavi D30" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/21/07/F2_Puja%20Tiwari_2.7.21_Pallavi_D30.png" style="width: 227px; height: 96px;">

Conclusion I: No Drones are Mugs → False(as some of the Drones which are Coins are Mugs)

Conclusion II: All Mugs being Drones is a possibility → True

The possibility diagram is as follows:

[ alt="F2 Puja Tiwari 2.7.21 Pallavi D31" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/21/07/F2_Puja%20Tiwari_2.7.21_Pallavi_D31.png" style="width: 160px; height: 98px;">

Hence, only Conclusion II follows.

Related Questions