Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Statement followed by some conclusions are given below. Statement: The search team believes that the plane debris recovered in 2016, near Mozambique was highly likely to be from MH370- Malaysian aircraft which disappeared after take-off in 2014. Conclusions: I. The debris found near Mozambique definitely belonged to MH370 aircraft. II. The search team is mistaken about the findings. Find which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements. A. Only conclusion I follows B. Only conclusion II follows C. Both I and II follow Neither I nor II follows

Statement followed by some conclusions are given below. Statement: The search team believes that the plane debris recovered in 2016, near Mozambique was highly likely to be from MH370- Malaysian aircraft which disappeared after take-off in 2014. Conclusions: I. The debris found near Mozambique definitely belonged to MH370 aircraft. II. The search team is mistaken about the findings. Find which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements. A. Only conclusion I follows B. Only conclusion II follows C. Both I and II follow Neither I nor II follows Correct Answer D

The search team believes that the plane debris recovered in 2016, near Mozambique was highly likely to be from MH370- Malaysian aircraft which disappeared after take-off in 2014.

Conclusions:

I. The debris found near Mozambique definitely belonged to MH370 aircraft. → False

The search team believes, but nothing is proven yet, so the above conclusion cannot be true.

II. The search team is mistaken about the findings. → False

It cannot be concluded that the belief of the team is true or not, so the above conclusion cannot be true.

Hence, neither I nor II follows.

Related Questions

Statement followed by some conclusions are given below. Statement : The search team believes that the plane debris recovered in 2016, near Mozambique was highly likely to be from MH370-Malaysian Aircraft which disappeared after take-off in 2014. Conclusions : I. The debris found near Mozambique definitely belonged to MH370 aircraft.
II. The search team is mistaken about the findings. Find which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
Statements followed by some conclusions are given below. Statements: 1. Some blues are violets whereas some are purples. 2. All oranges are reds and some reds are violets. 3. All purples are red. Conclusions: I. Some reds are blues. II. Some oranges are violets. Find which of the given conclusions logically follow from the given statements.  A. Only conclusion I follows. B. Only conclusion II follows. C. Both I and II follow. D. Neither I nor II follows.
In this question, after two statements i and ii two conclusions have been given. Assuming the given in the statement together as truth, consider both the findings together and decide on which one of them follows beyond the logical and appropriate scepticism based on the information given in the statement. Statement: Some papers are pen. All pencils are pen. Conclusion: i) Some pencils are papers ii) Some pen are pencils (A) Only conclusion i follows (B) Only conclusion ii follows (C) Either I or II follows (D) Neither I nor II follows (E) I and II both follow
A statement and its two conclusions - I and II are given. You have to follow the given statements is correct even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Statement: All belts are hot. All bolts are hot. Conclusions: I. At least some belts are bolts. II. All hot are belts. Decide which of the following options logically follows from the given conclusions. A. Only conclusion I follow. B. Only conclusion II follows. C. Both conclusions I and II follow. D. Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows.
Below are given statements followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Statements: All birds are trees. All trees are papers. Some papers are books. Conclusions: I. All birds are papers. II. Some birds are books. Decide which of the below options logically follows the given conclusions. A. Both conclusion I or II follows B. Neither conclusion I nor II follows C. Only conclusion I follows D. Only conclusion II follows
Some statements and its two conclusions 1 and 2 are given. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Statement: All mangoes are golden colored. No golden thing is cheap. Conclusion: 1. All mangoes are cheap. 2. Golden colored mangoes are not cheap. Decide which of the following options given below logically follows the given statements. A. Both conclusions 1 and 2 follow. B. Neither conclusion 1 nor conclusion 2 follows. C. Only conclusion 1 follows D. Only conclusion 2 follows
In this question, after a statement i and ii two conclusions have been given. Assuming the given in the statement together as truth, consider both the findings together and decide on which one of them follows beyond the logical and appropriate scepticism based on the information given in the statement. Statement: weight is inversely proportional to height Conclusion: i) If weight grows, height decreases. ii) If height increases, then weight increases. Choose the appropriate one of the following options. (A) Only the conclusion i follows (B) Only conclusion ii follow (C) Either i or ii follows (D) Neither i nor ii follows (E) Both i and ii follow
Below are the statements and some of their conclusions. You have to assume the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Statements: Some elephants are lions. Some lions are camels. Conclusion: I. Some cows are camels. II. All lions are cows. Decide which of the following conclusions logically follows from the given statements. A. Only conclusion I follows. B. Only conclusion II follows. C. Neither I nor II follows D. Both I and II follow.
Statements followed by some conclusions are given below. Statements:  A. Ravi works more than Meera, who works 8 hours per day. B. Yuvi works 9 hours per day, which is 1 hour less than Ravi. Conclusions: I. Ravi works 8 hours. II. Yuvi and Ravi per day both works more than Meera. Find which of the given conclusions logically follow from the given statements.  A. Only conclusion I follows. B. Only conclusion II follows. C. Both I and II follow. D. Neither I nor II follows.
Below are the statements and some of their conclusions. You have to follow the given statements correctly even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Statement: All chairs are windows. No window is a door. Conclusion: I. Some chairs are doors. II. No door is window. Decide which of the following conclusions logically follows from the given statements. A. Only conclusion I follows. B. Only conclusion II follows. C. Neither I nor II follows. D. Both I and II follow.