Which of the following has/have occurred in India after its liberalization of economic policies in 1991? 1. Share of agriculture in GDP increased enormously. 2. Share of India's exports in world trade increased. 3. FDI inflows increased. 4. India's foreign exchange reserves increased enormously. Select the correct answer using the codes given below:

Which of the following has/have occurred in India after its liberalization of economic policies in 1991? 1. Share of agriculture in GDP increased enormously. 2. Share of India's exports in world trade increased. 3. FDI inflows increased. 4. India's foreign exchange reserves increased enormously. Select the correct answer using the codes given below: Correct Answer 2, 3 and 4 only

The correct answer is 2, 3 and 4 only.

Key Points

  • India's agriculture sector has shown a gradual decline in contribution to the Indian economy post-reform.
    • Agriculture, India’s traditional occupation, now contributes only about 15% to the GDP, from 29% in 1991. Hence, statement 1 is not correct.
  • The opening up of the economy has led to a rapid increase in foreign direct investment (FDI -> by 150%) and foreign exchange reserves (by 20 times).
    • The foreign investment, which includes foreign direct investment and foreign institutional investment, has increased from about US $ 100 million in 1990-91 to the US $ 150 billion in 2003-04. Hence, statements 3 and 4 are correct.
  • Reforms in Industry:
    • India is seen as a successful exporter of IT software, auto parts, textiles, and engineering goods in the reform period. Hence, statement 2 is correct.

Related Questions

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong' arguments and which is/are ‘weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: The United States has launched what China calls the ‘largest trade war in economic history' and in its latest move targeted another $200 billion in Chinese export goods. The US-China spat is one of several trade fights picked by the protectionist President Donald Trump as his ‘America First' agenda disrupts trade relations among traditional allies. The growing share of international trade under threat has raised the prospect the escalating trade war could harm the global economy, shrinking investments and undermining supply chains. Why? Arguments: I. Several companies - including Total and Peugeot of France, and Russia's Lukoil - have said they are preparing to exit Iran ahead of US deadlines, the last of which is November 4. II. Trump argued the original deal from 2012 was lopsided in Seoul's favour but has also clouded the issue by appearing to link trade concessions to progress in his separate track of talks with nuclear-armed North Korea. III. Meanwhile, talks among the three NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) signatories, launched after Trump demanded an overhaul of the ‘terrible deal', have snagged notably owing to the US demands to increase American content installed in duty-free autos.