Statement I: James Prinsep, an officer in the mint of the East India Company, deciphered Brahmi and Kharosthi scripts which were used in the earliest inscriptions and coins. Statement II: James Prinsep found that most of the scripts mentioned a king referred to as Piyadassi-meaning 'pleasant to behold'

Statement I: James Prinsep, an officer in the mint of the East India Company, deciphered Brahmi and Kharosthi scripts which were used in the earliest inscriptions and coins. Statement II: James Prinsep found that most of the scripts mentioned a king referred to as Piyadassi-meaning 'pleasant to behold' Correct Answer <span style=" line-height: 107%; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I</span>

The correct answer is 2.

  • James Prinsep(1799 -1840)-
    • ​James Prinsep was an English scholar, orientalist, and antiquarian.
    • James Princep in India was an administrator in the mint of the British East India Company. 
    • The main contribution of James Princep to the development of Indian epigraphy can be seen in terms that he was the first person who deciphered the Brahmi and Kharosthi scripts. Hence, statement 1 is correct.

Key Points

  • Contribution of James Prinsep-
    • ​Some of the most momentous developments in Indian epigraphy took place in the 1830s, this was when James Prinsep deciphered Brahmi and Kharosthi, two scripts used in the earliest inscriptions and coins.
    • He found that most of these Scripts mentioned a king referred to as Piyadassi meaning "He who regards others with kindness".Hence, statement 2 is correct but statement 2 is not the correct explanation of Statement 1.
    • There were a few inscriptions which also referred to the king as Asoka, one of the most famous rulers known from Buddhist texts.

Related Questions

Following are the shortilisting criteria for a candidates to be called for Interview for the post of Deputy Manager in an Insurance company. The candidate must (i) be at least 30 years and not more than 35 years as on 1st January, 2020. (ii) be a graduate in any discipline. (iii) have done MBA with specialisation in insurance with at least 75% marks. (iv)have at least one year post qualification work experience in an insurance company. (v) have secured at least 60% of marks in the screening test conducted by the company. (vi) a native of Maharashtra. However, if the applicant fulfills the above mentioned criteria except a) at (iv) above, the case may be referred to the General Manager of the company. b) at (v) above, the case may be referred to the Chief Manager of the company. c) at (vi) above but has studied Marathi as one subject in class 10, his case will be referred to Divisional Manager of the company. Rekha Kesharwani is 32 years old as on 1st Jan 2020. She has done B.Sc. from a university in Uttar Pradesh. She has done her post graduation in Business administration with a specialisation of Insurance from a reputed institute at Pune in 2016. She has scored 75% marks in the screening test conducted by the company. She is working as a development officer in LIC of India. What decision about Rekha Kesharwani can be taken on the basis of the information given above?