Which of the statements given below is/are correct? 1. In India, the provisions of General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) will be implemented with effect from 1 April 2015. 2. The provisions of GAAR were aimed at checking tax avoidance by overseas investors. Select the correct answer using the code given below:
Which of the statements given below is/are correct? 1. In India, the provisions of General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) will be implemented with effect from 1 April 2015. 2. The provisions of GAAR were aimed at checking tax avoidance by overseas investors. Select the correct answer using the code given below: Correct Answer 2 only
The correct answer is 2 only.
Important Points
- General Anti-Avoidance Rule
- General Anti Avoidance rule (GAAR) is a set of rules or a framework which helps the revenue authorities decides whether a particular transaction has commercial substance or not. If it does not have commercial substance and is not a genuine transaction then what should be the tax liability associated with it.
- The General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) are designed to prevent the avoidance of tax by taking advantage of international tax laws.
- Originally, the rules were supposed to be implemented from April 1, 2014 onwards, but finally it came into effect on 1st April 2017. Hence, statement 1 is incorrect.
- It is framed by the Department of Revenue under the Ministry of Finance.
- Originally proposed in the Direct taxes code 2009, are targeted at arrangement or transactions made specifically to avoid taxes.
- It was considered controversial because it had provisions to seek taxes from past overseas deals involving local assets retrospectively.
- It allows tax officials to target participatory notes.
- Under GAAR, the investor has to prove that the participatory note was not set to avoid taxes. Hence, statement 2 is correct.
- It also allows officials to deny double taxation avoidance benefits, if deals made in tax havens like Mauritius were found to be avoiding taxes.
Additional Information
- The GAAR was introduced in India after the Vodafone deal with Hutchison-Essar. This deal took place in the Cayman Islands.
- As per the government, above USD 2 billion was lost in taxes.
- In the subsequent case, the Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone.
মোঃ আরিফুল ইসলাম
Feb 20, 2025