With reference to the Official Secrets Act, consider the following statements: 1. It was amended and made more stringent in the form of the Indian Official Secrets Act, 1904, during Lord Curzon’s tenure as Viceroy of India. 2. Under Section 5, only the person communicating the information can be punished. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

With reference to the Official Secrets Act, consider the following statements: 1. It was amended and made more stringent in the form of the Indian Official Secrets Act, 1904, during Lord Curzon’s tenure as Viceroy of India. 2. Under Section 5, only the person communicating the information can be punished. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? Correct Answer 1 only

The correct answer is 1 only.

In News - 

  • The Delhi police have arrested Rajeev Sharma, a journalist, under the Official Secrets Act (OSA).
    • The police claimed that he had passed on information such as the deployment of Indian troops on the border to Chinese intelligence officers.

Important Points

  • Official Secrets Act has its roots in the British colonial era.
    • The original version was the Indian Official Secrets Act (Act XIV), 1889.
    • It was amended and made more stringent in the form of the Indian Official Secrets Act, 1904, during Lord Curzon’s tenure as Viceroy of India. Hence statement 1 is correct.
  • In 1923, a newer version was notified.
    • The Indian Official Secrets Act (Act No XIX of 1923) was extended to all matters of secrecy and confidentiality in governance in the country.
    • It broadly deals with two aspects - spying or espionage, covered under Section 3, and disclosure of other secret information of the government, under Section 5.
    • Secret information can be any official code, password, sketch, plan, model, article, note, document, or information.
  • Under Section 5, both the person communicating the information and the person receiving the information can be punished. Hence statement 2 is not correct.

Related Questions

The conditions regarding selection from a list of suitable candidates to be called for interview after a written examination for appointment of management-level persons to a multi-national company providing accounting services and sales are mentioned below. Candidates: a) Must have a Bachelor's degree in Basic Science with 65% or more marks or BE with 55% or more marks. b) Must have passed the examination with 70% or more marks. c) Age must be between 25 to 30 years as of 1/4/18. d) Must have 3 years of experience in an Accounting Institution and must have a Diploma in Accounting with 60% or more marks. e) Must be currently getting CTC of Rs. 6 lakh or more per annum. If the candidate: 1) If he fulfills all the other conditions other than A above, he will be designated as Junior Accountant. 2) If he fulfills all the other conditions other than (d) and (e) above, he can be designated as Trainee-Accountant. If he fulfills all the above conditions including 5 years of experience, he can be designated as a Senior Accountant. He can be designated as Manager (Accounts) if he fulfills all the above criteria including educational qualifications of CA/ ICWA/ MBA (Finance). Study all the above information and answer the following question. Varun has passed the CA exam and has a bachelor's degree in basic science and a diploma in accountancy, having scored 75% or more in the written examination during his entire career and also in the written examination. His age is 27 years and with 4 years of experience in Accountancy, he has a CTC salary of 18 lakhs per annum. To which of the following positions can he be referred? Select from the given options.
Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I,or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar tothe understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken inIndia. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is intheir own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape,cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared tothat of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? Theonus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? Why do some French people think that Hindi is the only Indian language?