In the question below is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement: Statements: On Saturday, April 2nd, India won the 2011 Cricket World Cup, defending Sri Lanka by 6 wickets in final, played at the Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai, India. Conclusions: I. India scored chased 278 runs in finals. II. M. S. Dhoni was the captain of Indian Cricket team in 2011 Cricket World Cup.
In the question below is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement: Statements: On Saturday, April 2nd, India won the 2011 Cricket World Cup, defending Sri Lanka by 6 wickets in final, played at the Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai, India. Conclusions: I. India scored chased 278 runs in finals. II. M. S. Dhoni was the captain of Indian Cricket team in 2011 Cricket World Cup. Correct Answer Neither I nor II follows
Statements: On Saturday, April 2nd, India won the 2011 Cricket World Cup, defeating Sri Lanka by 6 wickets in final, played at the Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai, India.
Conclusions:
I. India scored chased 278 runs in finals → False
As, nothing is mentioned about the scores of Indian or Sri Lankan team.
II. M. S. Dhoni was the captain of Indian Cricket team in 2011 Cricket World Cup → False
As, in the paragraph M. S. Dhoni is not mentioned as a captain.
Hence, neither conclusion I nor II follows.