Which of the following Sultans ordered that Muslim women were not to come out of their houses or go to visit tombs outside the city of Delhi ? Select the correct answer from the code given below: (a) Balban (b) Firuz Tughlaq (c) Bahlol Lodi (d) Sikandar Lodi

Which of the following Sultans ordered that Muslim women were not to come out of their houses or go to visit tombs outside the city of Delhi ? Select the correct answer from the code given below: (a) Balban (b) Firuz Tughlaq (c) Bahlol Lodi (d) Sikandar Lodi Correct Answer (b) and (d)

  • The Sultan who forbade Muslim women to come out of houses and visit tombs outside Delhi was Sultan Firuz Shah Tughlaq and Sikander Lodi.
  • Firoz Shah Tughlaq was a very efficient administrator; his policies not only helped the consolidation of his empire but also founded newer cities in different parts of his empire. He also made provisions for the construction of canals, dams, reservoirs, mosques and schools. He also restored and repaired several pre-existing monuments such as the Qutub Minar.
  • Firuz Tughlaq was also a very devout Muslim and aligned his administrative and political policies according to the Shariat. He actively took the advice of the ulemas and imposed administration regulations as per Islamic law. It was in this spirit, that the law was passed that restricted Muslim women to come out of their houses or visit tombs outside Delhi.
  • Lokesh Chandra Nand’s pioneering work on the life and conditions of Women in the Delhi Sultanate talks about the restrictions placed by the 2 Sultans on Muslim women, this work also talks about the status and condition of widows during the Sultanate period. The work also documents the life of ordinary women during this period and the rules they were supposed to follow.
  • Hence the correct answer is Option 2 

Related Questions

In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: Soon VAT 69 whiskey and Smirnoff Vodka will not be found on the shelves of Delhi Liquor stores owing to the duplication of barcode by manufacturer United Limited. The Delhi government financial commissioner blacklisted the manufacturer. Financial commissioner Anindo Majumdar had said in an order dated September 14, that USL had violated provisions of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009 and Delhi Excise Rules, 2010 by using unauthorized and loose barcodes, which could be easily misused. Courses of action: I. The ban will force United Spirits Limited not to sell its liquor in the national capital for two years. II. the appellant violated provisions of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009, Delhi Excise Rules, 2010, the terms and conditions of the license issued to it and the standard operating procedure framed by the Delhi Excise Department and that consequently the department has rightly imposed the penalty of blacklisting under Rule 70 of the Delhi Excise Rules, 2010 upon United Spirits LTD (USL), Aurangabad. III. United Limited has been blacklisted by the Delhi government financial commissioner.