Consider the following assumption and two statements Assumption: A number ‘PQRSTU’ is divisible by 33. Statement 1: U – T + S – R + Q – P is divisible by 11. Statement 2: P + Q + R + S + T + U is divisible by 3. Which one of the following is correct?

Consider the following assumption and two statements Assumption: A number ‘PQRSTU’ is divisible by 33. Statement 1: U – T + S – R + Q – P is divisible by 11. Statement 2: P + Q + R + S + T + U is divisible by 3. Which one of the following is correct? Correct Answer Both the statements are together sufficient to prove the assumption 

Concept:

If the difference of the sum of odd digits and sum of even digits is either 0 or multiple of 11, then the number is divisible by 11.

If the sum of digits of a number is divisible by 3, then the number is also divisible by 3.

Calculation:

The number ‘PQRSTU’

Statement 1

The sum of odd digits = P + R + T

The sum of even digits = Q + S + U

The difference of the sum of odd and even digits = (P + R + T) – (Q + S + U)

⇒ P – Q + R – S + T – U

It follows the divisibility rule of 11.

Statement 2

Sum of all the digits = P + Q + R + S + T + U

It follows the divisibility rule of 3.

∴ Both the statements are together sufficient to prove the assumption.

Related Questions

Consider the following assumption and two statements Assumption: A number ‘PQRSTU’ is divisible by 11. Statement 1: U – T + S – R + Q – P is divisible by 11. Statement 2: P – Q + R – S + T – U = 0 Which one of the following is correct?
In each question below is given a statement numbered I, II and III. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. You have to consider the following assumption and decide which of the assumption is implicit in the statement. Statement: About a year ago, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had told the world that the signature of a chartered accountant on financial statements was, perhaps, more powerful than even one of his own. ‘Just like doctors don’t want people to be ill to get more business, chartered accountants, too, need to safeguard the society’s economic health. Your signature is more powerful than the PM’s, and the government also believes the accounts signed by you’, Modi had said.  Assumptions: I. The CA community, however, may not have woken up to the value of the initials they put on financial statements. Last year has been more of a challenge for the community’s reputation, with banking frauds, asset quality divergences and mid-term auditor resignations dominating the headlines.  II. There cannot be a situation where there will be 100% agreement on everything. You may have rules but still judgmental factors in credit, asset recognition come in. The approach is that as soon as the asset is stretched, banks have to recognise the problem.  III. But even basic logic just went out of the window and banks together kept dishing out loans to such companies even when their annual turnover was half of the total debt.