Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Which right has been abolished by the 44th Amendment Act, 1978?

Which right has been abolished by the 44th Amendment Act, 1978? Correct Answer Right to Property

The correct answer is Right to Property.

Key Points

  • The 44th Constitutional amendment act 1978 deleted the right to property from the list of Fundamental Rights.
  • Right to Property is no more a fundamental right, only a legal right.
  • The right to property was listed under article 31 before its deletion.
  • At the present right to property is listed under article 300A as a legal right.
  • In the original constitution, there were seven categories of fundamental rights in India.
  • After the deletion of the Right to the property by the 44th amendment, it was reduced to six.

Additional Information 

  • Now there are six categories of fundamental rights in India.
    • Right to Equality.
    • Right to Freedom.
    • Right against Exploitation.
    • Right to Freedom of Religion.
    • Cultural and Educational Rights.
    • Right to Constitutional Remedies.

Important Points

  •  Fundamental rights are justiciable.
  • The Supreme court and the High Courts are considered as the guardians of Fundamental rights in India.

Related Questions

Which of the following is/are correct about Right to Property? 1. It was made a Constitutional right under Article 300A by the 44th Constitutional Amendment, 1978. 2. Right to Property is a Natural Right.
Consider the following pairs:- S.No Amendment Amendment Act 1. Fundamental Right to Property was curtailed 25th Amendment Act 2. Lok Sabha seats were increased from 525 to 545 31st Amendment Act 3. The voting age was decreased from 21 to 18 61st  Amendment Act Which among the above pairs is/are correctly matched?
Which one of the following has not been provided by the 44th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1978 relating to National Emergency?
Consider the following statements- 1. Right to Vote is a legal right and not a fundamental right 2. Right to Property is not a fundamental right. 3. Article 300-A was inserted in the Constitution of India by the 44th constitutional amendment. 4. Article 301 pertains to the Right to Property Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Which of the following provisions are added by the 44th Amendment Act, 1978? 1) Right to property deleted from the list of Fundamental Rights 2) National emergency to be declared by only on the written recommendation of the cabinet. 3) The term ‘armed rebellion’ in respect of national emergency was replaced by ‘internal disturbance’. 4) The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the high courts in respect of judicial review was re-established.
If a + b + c + d = 4, then find the value of $$\frac{1}{{\left( {1 - a} \right)\left( {1 - b} \right)\left( {1 - c} \right)}}$$     + $$\frac{1}{{\left( {1 - b} \right)\left( {1 - c} \right)\left( {1 - d} \right)}}$$     + $$\frac{1}{{\left( {1 - c} \right)\left( {1 - d} \right)\left( {1 - a} \right)}}$$     + $$\frac{1}{{\left( {1 - d} \right)\left( {1 - a} \right)\left( {1 - b} \right)}}$$     is?
If a + b + c + d = 4, then the value of $$\frac{1}{{\left( {1 - a} \right)\left( {1 - b} \right)\left( {1 - c} \right)}}$$     + $$\frac{1}{{\left( {1 - b} \right)\left( {1 - c} \right)\left( {1 - d} \right)}}$$     + $$\frac{1}{{\left( {1 - c} \right)\left( {1 - d} \right)\left( {1 - a} \right)}}$$     + $$\frac{1}{{\left( {1 - d} \right)\left( {1 - a} \right)\left( {1 - b} \right)}}$$     is?
PRINCIPLES: 1. Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defense.
2. When an act, which would otherwise be a certain offence, is not that offence, by reason of the youth, the want of maturity of understanding, the unsoundness of mind or the intoxication of that person or by reason of misconception on the part of that person, every person has the same right of private defense against that act, which he would have if that act were an offence.
3. Everyone has the right to defend their life and property against criminal harm provided it is not possible to approach public authorities and more harm than that is necessary has not been caused to avert the danger.
4. If in the exercise of right of private defense against an assault which reasonably causes the apprehension of death, the defender be so situated that he cannot effectually exercise that right without risk of harm to an innocent person, his right of private defense extends to the running of that risk.
5. The right of private defense continues as long as apprehension of danger continues.
FACT: A enters by night a house which he is legally entitled to enter. Z, in good faith, taking A for a housebreaker, attacks A.
Which among the following Articles was added as a Directive Principles of State Policy by 44th Amendment Act of 1978?
According to the National Emergency, which of the following changes were made by the 44th Amendment act of 1978?