Which Ranthambore ruler defeated Jalaluddin Khilji of the Delhi Sultanate, but was eventually defeated by Alauddin Khilji in 1301?

Which Ranthambore ruler defeated Jalaluddin Khilji of the Delhi Sultanate, but was eventually defeated by Alauddin Khilji in 1301? Correct Answer Hammir Dev Chauhan

The correct answer is Hammir Dev Chauhan.

Key Points 

  • Hammir Dev Chauhan ruler defeated Jalaluddin Khilji of the Delhi Sultanate but was eventually defeated by Alauddin Khilji in 1301.
    • In 1303, the Delhi Sultanate ruler Alauddin Khilji captured the Chittor Fort from the Guhila king Ratnasimha, after an eight-month-long siege.
    • Alauddin began what later came to be known as the Imperial period of the sultanate of Delhi.

Additional Information 

  • Alauddin Khilji was an emperor of the Khilji dynasty that ruled the Delhi Sultanate in the Indian subcontinent.
    • Alauddin made many important administrative changes related to revenue, price control, and society.
    • Alauddin was the nephew and son-in-law of his predecessor Jalaluddin.
    • When Jalaluddin became the Sultan of Delhi after overthrowing the Mamluks, Alauddin was given the rank of Amir-i-Tuzuk (equivalent to the lord of ceremonies).
    • In 1296, Alauddin raided Devagiri and acquired loot to stage a successful revolt against Jalaluddin.

Related Questions

In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: Soon VAT 69 whiskey and Smirnoff Vodka will not be found on the shelves of Delhi Liquor stores owing to the duplication of barcode by manufacturer United Limited. The Delhi government financial commissioner blacklisted the manufacturer. Financial commissioner Anindo Majumdar had said in an order dated September 14, that USL had violated provisions of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009 and Delhi Excise Rules, 2010 by using unauthorized and loose barcodes, which could be easily misused. Courses of action: I. The ban will force United Spirits Limited not to sell its liquor in the national capital for two years. II. the appellant violated provisions of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009, Delhi Excise Rules, 2010, the terms and conditions of the license issued to it and the standard operating procedure framed by the Delhi Excise Department and that consequently the department has rightly imposed the penalty of blacklisting under Rule 70 of the Delhi Excise Rules, 2010 upon United Spirits LTD (USL), Aurangabad. III. United Limited has been blacklisted by the Delhi government financial commissioner.