According to the Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act, 2001, Member Economic Participation is defined under which Co-operative Principles?

According to the Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act, 2001, Member Economic Participation is defined under which Co-operative Principles? Correct Answer 3rd Principle

The correct answer is  3rd Principle.

Key Points

  • The co-operative principles are guidelines by which co-operatives put their values into practice.
  • Member Economic Participation is defined under the 3rd Principle.
  • According to the 3rd Principle:-
    • Members contribute to, and democratically control, the capital of their co-operative. At least part of that capital is usually the common property of the cooperative.
    • Members usually receive limited compensation, if any, on capital subscribed to as a condition of membership. Members allocate surpluses for any of the following purposes:-
      • Developing their co-operative, possibly by setting up reserves, part of which at least would be indivisible, benefiting members in proportion to their transactions with the co-operative, and supporting other activities approved by the membership.


Additional Information

  • There are total 6 Co-operative Principles:-
    • 1st Principle:-  Voluntary and Open Membership 
    • 2nd Principle:- Democratic Member Control
    • 3rd Principle:- Member Economic Participation 
    • 4th Principle:- Autonomy and Independence
    • 5th Principle:-  Education, Training, and Information
    • 6th Principle:-  Co-operation among Co-operatives

Related Questions

Read the following passage carefully and choose the most appropriate answer to the question out of the four alternatives.
Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the spell of the free market. Consequently, nothing seems good or normal that does notaccord with the requirements of the free market. A price that is determined by the seller or, for that matter (for that matter: so far as that isconcerned), established by anyone other than the aggregate of consumers seems pernicious. Accordingly, it requires a major act of will to thinkof price-fixing (the determination of prices by the seller) as both "normal" and having a valuable economic function. In fact, price-fixing is normalin all industrialized societies because the industrial system itself provides, as an effortless consequence of its own development, the price-fixingthat it requires. Modern industrial planning requires and rewards great size. Hence, a comparatively small number of large firms will be competingfor the same group of consumers. That each large firm will act with consideration of its own needs and thus avoid selling its products for morethan its competitors charge is commonly recognized by advocates of free-market economic theories. But each large firm will also act with fullconsideration of the needs that it has in common with the other large firms competing for the same customers. Who, according to the economists, are the right group of people to set the price of a commodity?