In the question below are given two statements followed by two conclusion. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All cars are tyres. Some clutchs are tyres. Conclusions: I. Some cars are clutchs. II. Some clutchs are cars.
In the question below are given two statements followed by two conclusion. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All cars are tyres. Some clutchs are tyres. Conclusions: I. Some cars are clutchs. II. Some clutchs are cars. Correct Answer If neither conclusion I nor II follows
The least possible Venn diagram for the given statements is as below,
Conclusions:
I. Some cars are clutchs → False (There is no direct relation between cars and cluths)
II. Some clutchs are cars → False (There is no direct relation between cars and cluths)
Hence, neither conclusion I nor II follows.
Additional Information [ alt="download (2)" src="https://storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/21/07/download%20%282%29.png" style="width: 347px; height: 372px;">