Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Which of the following Indian ministries recently launched UDISE+ for 2019-2020?

Which of the following Indian ministries recently launched UDISE+ for 2019-2020? Correct Answer Ministry of Education

The correct answer is the Ministry of Education.

Key Points

  • Ministry of Education recently launched UDISE+ for 2019-2020.
  • Union Education Minister released the Report on United Information System for Education Plus (UDISE+) 2019-20 for School Education in India.
  • Unified District Information System for Education Plus report (UDISE+) for 2019-2020 was released by Union minister of education, Ramesh Pokhriyal Nishank (As of May 2022).
  • United Information System for Education Plus is one of the largest Management Information Systems for school education.
  • It was introduced in 2018-2019 with the goal of speeding up data entry, reducing errors, improving data quality, and simplifying data verification.
  • The total number of students enrolled in school from pre-primary to higher secondary has surpassed 26.45 crores in 2019-20.
  • This is a 42.3 lakh increase over the previous year.
  • The number of boys enrolled was 13.01 million, while the number of girls enrolled was 12.08 million.

Related Questions

As per the report on United Information System for Education Plus (UDISE) 2019-20 for School Education in India, enrolment of girls from primary to higher secondary has increased substantially by over how many lakhs in 2019-20?
Which of the following are the reforms introduced in Budget 2017-2018? 1. Presentation of Budget advanced to 1st February to enable the Ministries to operationalize all activities from the commencement of the financial year 2. Merger of Railway Budget with General Budget to bring Railways to the centre stage of Government’s Fiscal Policy  3. Removal of plan and non-plan classification of expenditure to facilitate a holistic view of allocations for Sectors and Ministries Select the correct answer using the code given below:
The MK Stalin led DMK government in Tamil Nadu has renamed how many ministries of the 34 ministries?
Consider the following statements:
1. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires two persons whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code require five persons.
2. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires common intention, whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code requires common object
3. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code both require presence of a prior consent
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and section 149 of Indian Penal Code. Both create specific offence
Which of the above statements are correct?
Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I,or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar tothe understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken inIndia. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is intheir own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape,cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared tothat of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? Theonus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? Why do some French people think that Hindi is the only Indian language?
On 17th December 2020, India recently launched the CMS-01 communication satellite into the geostationary Transfer Orbit. What statements is/are CORRECT regarding the satellite? 1. The satellite was launched on a PSLV-C50 launch vehicle. 2. The satellite will provide telecom services in the extended C-Band of the frequency spectrum. 3. Is India's 40th communication satellite that will replace the functions of GSAT-12 launched in 2013. Select the correct answer using the code given below. (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) 3 only (d) Both 1 and 2
Carefully read following statements:
1. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of two persons, whereas under Section 149 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of five persons.
2. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, common intention is required whereas under Section 149 Indian Penal Code, common object is required
3. Previous consent is required under Section 34 & 149 of Indian Penal Code
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code constitutes a specific offence
Which of the above statements is true:
Which of the following is true about Indian Vulture? 1. It is called Gyps Indicus as per binomial nomenclature. 2. The cause of the decline in the population of Indian Vultures has been identified as poisoning caused by the veterinary drug Diclofenac. 3. Jatayu Conservation Breeding Centre is situated in Jharkhand. 4. Recently, Gyps Vulture Reintroduction Programme was launched for the conservation of Indian Vulture by the Haryana Government.
Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I,or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar tothe understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken inIndia. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is intheir own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape,cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared tothat of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? Theonus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? The writer was working at a university in which country?
Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I,or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar tothe understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken inIndia. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is intheir own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape,cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared tothat of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? Theonus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? What wrong with respect to India are the Europeans responsible for?