Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the statements. Statements: All camels are bats. No bat is a parrot. Some camels are lions. Conclusions: I. Some bats are lions. II. No parrot is a camel. III. No parrot is a lion.

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the statements. Statements: All camels are bats. No bat is a parrot. Some camels are lions. Conclusions: I. Some bats are lions. II. No parrot is a camel. III. No parrot is a lion. Correct Answer Both conclusions I and II follow

[ alt="SYLL" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/21/12/SYLL.png" style="width: 347px; height: 372px;">

The least possible Venn diagram is :

[ alt="F1 Puja Ravi 8.12.2021 D1" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/21/12/F1_Puja_Ravi_8.12.2021_D1.png" style="width: 239px; height: 106px;">

Conclusions:

I. Some bats are lions. → Ture (From the statement all camels are bats and some camels are lions. So due to this some bats are lions.) 

[ alt="F1 Puja Ravi 8.12.2021 D2" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/21/12/F1_Puja_Ravi_8.12.2021_D2.png" style="width: 239px; height: 106px;">

II. No parrot is a camel. → Ture (From the statement all camels are bats and no bat is a parrot. So due to this no parrot is a camel.)

III. No parrot is a lion. → False (From the above diagram there is no direct relation between parrot and lion with the definite condition.)

Hence, "option 3" is the correct answer.

Related Questions