Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

15- year-old Anurudh Ganesan has invented a _portable_ refrigeration system that enables doctors to transport vaccines safely and effectively. A synonym of the underlined word is :

15- year-old Anurudh Ganesan has invented a _portable_ refrigeration system that enables doctors to transport vaccines safely and effectively. A synonym of the underlined word is : Correct Answer mobile

Related Questions

Statements and conclusions derived from them are given below. Select the correct option about conclusions. Statements: a. All carpenters are doctors. b. All carpenters are writers. Conclusions: I. All writers are doctors. II. Some doctors are writers. III. Generally doctors are writers. IV. All doctors are carpenters. 
Read the passage and answer the questions that follow. Evaluation of candidate vaccines for COVID-19 should be done on technical parameters and programmatic suitability. An ideal vaccine would provide the following- immunity that is of a high degree (90%+ protective especially against severe illness), broad-scale (against different variants) and durable (at least five years if not lifelong); a vaccine that is safe (little or no side effects and definitely no serious adverse effects); a vaccine that is cheap (similar to current childhood vaccines); a vaccine that is programmatically suitable- single dose, can be kept at room temperature or at worst needs simple refrigeration between 2 degrees Celsius and 4 degrees Celsius, needle-free delivery, and a vaccine that is available in multi-dose vials, has long shelf life and is amenable to rapid production. Obviously, a vaccine having all these desirable characteristics is a pipe dream, and most vaccines fare well in some and not so well in other parameters, making it difficult to choose between them. What is the most appropriate meaning of the phrase PIPE DREAM?
Read the passage and answer the questions that follow. Evaluation of candidate vaccines for COVID-19 should be done on technical parameters and programmatic suitability. An ideal vaccine would provide the following- immunity that is of a high degree (90%+ protective especially against severe illness), broad-scale (against different variants) and durable (at least five years if not lifelong); a vaccine that is safe (little or no side effects and definitely no serious adverse effects); a vaccine that is cheap (similar to current childhood vaccines); a vaccine that is programmatically suitable- single dose, can be kept at room temperature or at worst needs simple refrigeration between 2 degrees Celsius and 4 degrees Celsius, needle-free delivery, and a vaccine that is available is multi-dose vials, has long shelf life and is amenable to rapid production. Obviously, a vaccine having all these desirable characteristics is a pipe dream, and most vaccines fare well in some and not so well in other parameters, making it difficult to choose between them. According to the passage, which of the following is NOT a desirable parameter for a vaccine?
Read the passage and answer the questions that follow. Evaluation of candidate vaccines for COVID-19 should be done on technical parameters and programmatic suitability. An ideal vaccine would provide the following- immunity that is of a high degree (90%+ protective especially against severe illness), broad-scale ( against different variants) and durable (at least five years if not lifelong); a vaccine that is safe (little or no side effects and definitely no serious adverse effects); a vaccine that is cheap (similar to current childhood vaccines); a vaccine that is programmatically suitable- single dose, can be kept at room temperature or at worst needs simple refrigeration between 2 degrees Celsius and 4 degrees Celsius, needle-free delivery, and a vaccine that is available in multi-dose vials, has long shelf life and is amenable to rapid production. Obviously, a vaccine having all these desirable characteristics is a pipe dream, and most vaccines fare well in some and not so well in other parameters, making it difficult to choose between them. What is the tone of the author in the passage?
Given below are two premises a) and b). Four conclusions are drawn from them. Select the code that states validly drawn conclusion(s). [Taking the premises individually or jointly] Premises: a) All judges are lawyers. b) No doctors are lawyers. Conclusions: i) No lawyers are doctors. ii) No doctors are judges. iii) All lawyers are judges. iv) Some doctors are judges.
Three statements are given, followed by four conclusions numbered I, Il, Ill and IV. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some advocates are doctors. Some doctors are players. All players are engineers. Conclusions: I. Some players are doctors. Il. Some engineers are advocates. Ill. All advocates are engineers. IV. Some engineers are doctors.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All teachers are doctors. Some professors are doctors. All professors are engineers. Conclusions: I. All professors are doctors. II. Some doctors are engineers. III. Some teachers are engineers. IV. Some teachers are professors
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements : (a) Some doctors are soldiers. (b) All managers are soldiers. Conclusions : (i) All doctors are soldiers. (ii) Some soldiers are managers. (iii) All solders are doctors. (iv) Some doctors are managers.
Three statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming  the statement to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some engineers are doctors. Some doctors are architects. Some architects are designers. Conclusions: I. Some designers are engineers. II. Some architects are doctors. III. Some doctors are engineers.
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: All patients are nurses. Some patients are doctors. No peon is a nurse. Conclusions: I. Some doctors are peons. II. No patient is peon. III. Some doctors are nurses. IV. Some doctors are not peons.