Which two Indians became the first pair to reach the finals of all Grand Slams in a year in the Open era, winning French Open and Wimbledon as top seeds?

Which two Indians became the first pair to reach the finals of all Grand Slams in a year in the Open era, winning French Open and Wimbledon as top seeds? Correct Answer Leander Paes and Mahesh Bhupathi

The correct answer is Leander Paes and Mahesh Bhupathi.

Key Points

  • Leander Paes and Mahesh Bhupathi were the first Indian pair to reach the finals of all Grand Slams in a year in the Open era, winning French Open and Wimbledon as top seeds.
  • Paes-Bhupathi's pair went unbeaten in the team competition from 1997 to 2010.
  • Leander Paes and Mahesh Bhupathi's pair reached the finals of all four majors in 1999.
  • They created a record for the longest winning streak(24 number).
  • Leander Paes had won an Olympic medal in 1996.
    • He received the Major Dhyan Chand Khel Ratna award in 1996–97.
    • He was honored with the Arjuna Award in 1990.
    • He received the Padma Shri award in 2001.
  • Mahesh Bhupathi secured the first Grand Slam by an Indian at the 1997 French Open.
    • He the first Indian to win a major tournament along with Rika Hiraki.
    • He received the Padma Shri award in 2001.
  • Paes-Bhupathi pair won their first Grand Slam semi-final at the US Open as 10th seeds in 1997.
  • They reached their first final together at the Australian Open as top seeds in 1999.

Additional Information

  • Yuki Bhambri is an Indian professional tennis player who became the first Indian to win the junior Australian Open title.
    • He represents India in the Davis Cup.
    • He is the fourth Indian in history to capture a junior singles title at a Grand Slam championship.
  • Rohan Bopanna is an Indian professional tennis player who has been a member of the Indian Davis Cup team since 2002.
    • Rohan Bopanna played with Mahesh Bhupathi in 2012.
    • Bopanna participated in the Australian Open 2021.

Related Questions

Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I,or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar tothe understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken inIndia. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is intheir own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape,cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared tothat of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? Theonus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? Why do some French people think that Hindi is the only Indian language?
A passage is given with five questions following it. Read the passage carefully and select the best answer to each question out of the given fouralternatives. He wasn't the first, nor would he be the last, but the wiry, bespectacled man from Gujarat is certainly the most famous of the world's peaceful political dissidents.Mohandas Gandhi – also affectionately known as Mahatma – led India's independence movement in the 1930s and 40s by speaking softly without carrying much ofa big stick, facing down the British colonialists with stirring speeches and non-violent protest. More than anything else, historians say, Gandhi proved that one manhas the power to take on an empire, using both ethics and intelligence. Urges Britain to quit India It is hard to imagine the thin, robed Gandhi working in the rough and tumble world of law, but Gandhi did get his start in politics as a lawyer in South Africa, where he supported the local Indian community's struggle for civil rights. Returning to India in 1915, he carried over his desire to improve the situation of the lower classes. Gandhi quickly became a leader within the Indian National Congress, a growing political party supporting independence, and traveled widely with the party to learnabout the local struggles of various Indian communities. It was during those travels that his legend grew among the Indian people, historians say. Gandhi was known as much for his wit and intelligence as for his piety. When he was arrested several more times over the years for his actions during the movement,Gandhi calmly fasted in prison, believing that his death would embarrass the British enough to spur independence, which had become the focus of his politics by1920. Gandhi's non-cooperation movement, kicked off in the early 1920s, called for Indians to boycott British goods and traditions and become self-reliant. His mostfamous protest came in 1930, when Gandhi led thousands of Indians on a 250-mile march to a coastal town to produce salt, on which the British had a monopoly. What led to the growth of legend of Mahatma Gandhi among the Indians?