Which of the following is NOT direct method to solve intergroup conflicts?

Which of the following is NOT direct method to solve intergroup conflicts? Correct Answer Persuasion

The correct answer is Persuasion.

  • Persuasion is the indirect method, in which the groups find the areas of common interests among themselves.

Key Points

  • Intergroup conflict is when the conflict between groups inside and outside an organization disagree on various issues.
    • Within those types of conflict, one can experience horizontal conflict, which is a conflict with others that are at the same peer level as you, or vertical conflict, which is a conflict with a manager or a subordinate.

Additional Information

  • The direct method to solve intergroup conflicts-
    • Ignoring the conflict
    • Domination by the management
    • Removing the key figures in the conflict
    • Problem-solving
  • Persuasion is the indirect method, in which the groups find the areas of common interests among themselves.
    • The groups try to find out those interests levels where they have the same say.
    • Afterward’, the groups try to show how important it is to each of them in attaining organizational goals.
    • But persuasion is possible only if there are no clashes between the groups and their members.

Related Questions

We have three method to solve for the unknown force in the trusses. They are method of section, method of joints and rotational vector method.
Which of the following interventions is related to intergroup relations?
Read the passage carefully and select the best answer to each question out of the given four alternatives. By practicing mindfulness and other principles, we become more aware of and present to our fears and others fears, bearing witness as a way of healing andempowering. We see the spiritual path as intertwined with the path of social action, with contemplation and action parts of the same whole, each nourishing andguiding the other. Acknowledging that our well-being depends on others makes caring for others well-being a moral responsibility.
Through a “mindful citizen” exercise, we create a story articulating who we are as individuals who are also part of communities. This exercise helps us move beyond cynicism, complacency, and despair, instead infusing us with a sense of purpose. We embrace our gifts, resolving to do our part to promote a sense of common humanity as a means toward social justice.
With this exercise, I believe we can help students bridge their divides and replace anger and distrust with compassionate connections – just as I witnessed betweenShirley and Tiffany.
Shirley returned to class after a brief hiatus, keeping a cool distance from Tiffany. But over the weeks spent together they gradually came to know each other. They practiced seeing and listening, sharing stories so different that they felt bewildered as to how they could overcome the gap. But they found that acknowledging their
differences led them to discover a place of deep connection in commonalities, such as being raised by grandmothers, and even wounds, including childhood trauma,that they never imagined existed.
In assessments of these classes, students say that these small groups become “healing communities,” where we overcome victimization and claim agency. Healingoccurs as we transcend an “us vs. them” mentality, crossing borders and forging connections. These communities show a way of reducing intergroup prejudice andfostering inclusion based in psychology research and pedagogical practice. What makes the others well-being a moral responsibility for us?