Which of the following statement(s) is/are TRUE? (i) For every NFA with an arbitrary number of final states, there is an equivalent NFA with only one final state. (ii) A language that is accepted by a DFA will also be accepted by some NFA.

Which of the following statement(s) is/are TRUE? (i) For every NFA with an arbitrary number of final states, there is an equivalent NFA with only one final state. (ii) A language that is accepted by a DFA will also be accepted by some NFA. Correct Answer Both (i) and (ii)

The correct answer is option 4.

Concept​:

Option i: For every NFA with an arbitrary number of final states, there is an equivalent NFA with only one final state.

True, Every NFA with more than one final state can be converted into an NFA with a single final state. Add a new state to the NFA and introduce epsilon transitions from every old final state to the new state. Make the new state the final state and all the old final states as nonfinal states.

Option ii: A language that is accepted by a DFA will also be accepted by some NFA.

True, A language that is accepted by a DFA will also be accepted by some NFA because there exist many paths for specific input from the current state to the next state among one path the valid string will go to the final state.

A language accepted by a regular expression is also accepted by some NFA but not necessarily accepted by a DFA.

Hence the correct answer is Both (i) and (ii).

Related Questions

Which of the following options is correct? Statement 1: Initial State of NFA is Initial State of DFA. Statement 2: The final state of DFA will be every combination of final state of NFA.
Consider the set of strings on {0,1} in which, every substring of 3 symbols has at most two zeros. For example, 001110 and 011001 are in the language, but 100010 is not. All strings of length less than 3 are also in the language. A partially completed DFA that accepts this language is shown below. The missing arcs in the DFA are
Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I,or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar tothe understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken inIndia. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is intheir own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape,cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared tothat of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? Theonus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? Why do some French people think that Hindi is the only Indian language?