In the question given below, there is a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions, and decide which of the assumptions is/are implicit in the statement : Statement : Equality of income throughout a community is the essential condition for maximizing the total utility which can provide total available income to the members of that community. Assumptions : (I) If extra incomes were taken from the rich and given to the poor, the total utility experienced by the community would increase (II) Equal pay for equal work

In the question given below, there is a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions, and decide which of the assumptions is/are implicit in the statement : Statement : Equality of income throughout a community is the essential condition for maximizing the total utility which can provide total available income to the members of that community. Assumptions : (I) If extra incomes were taken from the rich and given to the poor, the total utility experienced by the community would increase (II) Equal pay for equal work Correct Answer Only assumption I is implicit

The correct answer is Only assumption I is implicit.

Key Points

  • As the statement is emphasizing the equality of income we can assume that there exists inequality.
  • Extra income from the rich can be given to the poor so that poor can enjoy more choices that benefit their life. Hence Assumption I is correct.  
  • Assumption 2 is not valid working and pay cannot be linked with the given context, as it only talks about how to increase the total utility of the community.  

Related Questions

In each question below is given a statement numbered I, II and III. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. You have to consider the following assumption and decide which of the assumption is implicit in the statement. Statement: About a year ago, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had told the world that the signature of a chartered accountant on financial statements was, perhaps, more powerful than even one of his own. ‘Just like doctors don’t want people to be ill to get more business, chartered accountants, too, need to safeguard the society’s economic health. Your signature is more powerful than the PM’s, and the government also believes the accounts signed by you’, Modi had said.  Assumptions: I. The CA community, however, may not have woken up to the value of the initials they put on financial statements. Last year has been more of a challenge for the community’s reputation, with banking frauds, asset quality divergences and mid-term auditor resignations dominating the headlines.  II. There cannot be a situation where there will be 100% agreement on everything. You may have rules but still judgmental factors in credit, asset recognition come in. The approach is that as soon as the asset is stretched, banks have to recognise the problem.  III. But even basic logic just went out of the window and banks together kept dishing out loans to such companies even when their annual turnover was half of the total debt.