Which of the following statements are correct with reference to the argument by analogy? A. It is a deductive type of argument B. It is an inductive type of argument C. It is not intended to be mathematically certain D. It is to be classified as either valid or invalid E. Its conclusion does not follow from the premises with logical necessity Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Which of the following statements are correct with reference to the argument by analogy? A. It is a deductive type of argument B. It is an inductive type of argument C. It is not intended to be mathematically certain D. It is to be classified as either valid or invalid E. Its conclusion does not follow from the premises with logical necessity Choose the correct answer from the options given below: Correct Answer B, C and E only
The argument of analogy is perceived similarities are utilized as a foundation for inferring a yet-to-be-observed similarity.
Key Points
- To argue by analogy is claiming that because two things are comparable, what is true for one is also true for the other.
- For example, there might be life on Europa because it has an atmosphere that contains oxygen just like the Earth.
- These arguments can be strongly predictive.
- It is an inductive type of argument
- Sometimes analogical reasoning is the only available form of justification for a hypothesis.
- An analogies argument allows us to make demonstrative inferences.
- It is not intended to be mathematically certain.
- An analogical argument is just to persuade people to take an idea seriously.
Therefore, B, C, and E only statements are correct with reference to the argument by analogy.
Additional Information
Evaluating analogical arguments in the following ways:
| Truth | First and foremost, we must ensure that the two objects being compared are similar in the way that is assumed. |
| Relevance | Even though the two items are similar, we must ensure that the qualities that they share are genuinely important to the conclusion. |
| Number | The analogical argument is stronger when we can identify a large number of shared properties between two items that are all relevant to the conclusion, rather than when we can only identify one or a few similar properties. |
| Diversity | Whether the common attributes are of the same type or of various types is the question here. |
| Disanalogy | Even if two items X and Y are comparable in many important ways, we should investigate whether X and Y have any differences that might cast doubt on the conclusion. |
মোঃ আরিফুল ইসলাম
Feb 20, 2025