A fallacy in which an opponent’s position is depicted as being more extreme or unreasonable than is justified by what was actually asserted is called:

A fallacy in which an opponent’s position is depicted as being more extreme or unreasonable than is justified by what was actually asserted is called: Correct Answer Straw Man

Fallacy is the class name given to bad (illogical) arguments. Fallacies are like plastic flowers: They give you the impression that they are valid. But, a student of logic, like a bee, should be able to distinguish between the real (valid) and the artificial (invalid). There are four main categories: fallacies of relevance, induction, presumption, and ambiguity.

Following are the fallacies of relevance:

  1. Argumentum ad Baculum:
  • It consists in appealing to physical force to make the opponent to submit.
  • ‘Appeal to the stick’ is hardly logic, though sometimes very effective, for example, in making the criminals confess their crimes.
  • The threat of force in any form is unreasonable and therefore fallacious.
  1. The Red Herring:
  • ​It distracts the attention of listeners from the topic under discussion. Red herring is used to distract his dogs. It means a trail is left to mislead deliberately. So when a listener is off the track is served as a red hurring.
  1. Argumentum ad Hominem:
  • It consists in attacking the character of the opponent instead of proving or disproving the point at issue.
  • The argument merely refers to his conduct, Instead of proof.
  • The thrust of the argument which commits the fallacy of ad hominem is not on the disputed conclusion, but on some person who defends it.
  • The personal attack is hurting, and might be conducted in either of two ways: One is abusive and the other circumstantial.
  1. Straw Man:
  • It is a way of arguing against some view by presenting an opponent’s position as one that is easily torn apart.
  • It is very much easier to win a fight against a man made of straw than against one made of flesh and blood.
  • To argue that one should not join the civil services since some civil servants are corrupt and by joining the service one would be supporting this systematic corruption is an example of a straw man argument.
  • This fallacy results when we adopt the most extreme view possible – that every act or policy of a certain kind is to be rejected.
  • This argument is easy to win, but not relevant to the conclusion originally proposed.

Related Questions

In the following question, the 1st and the last part of the sentence/passage are numbered 1 and 6. The rest of the sentence/ the passage is split into four parts and named P, Q, R and S. These four parts are not given in their proper order. Read the sentence/ passage and find out which of the four combinations is correct. 1. A range of extreme weather events in 2018 — think extreme rainfall, floods, landslides, cyclones, and heatwaves — claimed 2,081 lives in India, more than181 other countries that featured on a new global climate risk index. P. These rankings were recently released by the non-profit Germanwatch in a report titled The Global Climate Risk 2020, the results of which are calculated based on average values over a 20-year period, i.e., 1998 to 2018. Q. In terms of economic losses, India ranked second. Overall, per this index, in 2018, India was the fifth-worst-hit country by climate change, pushed up by nine ranks from 2017, when it was the 14th. R. Talking of rainfall-related calamities such as cyclones, floods, and landslides, as many as 6,585 people have died in India in the three-year period leading up to July 2019. S. In 2018, India was affected by a range of extreme weather events including floods in Kerala, tropical cyclones like Gaja and Titli, as well as a prolonged heatwave, all of which have collectively propelled India to the top position. 6. “This is a clear signal that climate change impacts are happening, and increasing everywhere, including in developed countries.