Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Aspergillosis of the Central Nervous System

Aspergillosis of the Central Nervous System

Aspergillosis is a type of infection that is caused by fungi of the genus Aspergillus. It is a common fungal infection that can affect the lungs, sinuses, inner ear, skin, brain, and other organs. It is an opportunistic infection, meaning it will usually only affect people with weakened immune systems. In people with weakened immune systems, Aspergillosis can spread to the central nervous system.

The diagnosis of Aspergillosis of the Central Nervous System is based on a complete medical history, physical examination, and laboratory tests. Brain imaging studies such as CT scans or MRI may be helpful in diagnosing Aspergillosis of the Central Nervous System. Symptoms of an infection may include confusion, difficulty speaking, irritability, memory problems, nausea, and loss of balance.

Treatment of Aspergillosis of the Central Nervous System can be difficult, as medications used to treat fungal infections, such as antifungal drugs, may not be effective against this type of infection. Surgery may be recommended in some cases. In addition, long-term use of antifungal medications may be needed to control the Aspergillosis.

In order to prevent Aspergillosis of the Central Nervous System, it is important to avoid contact with people with weakened immune systems, wear protective clothing in dusty environments, and keep immunizations up to date.

Some of the complications of Aspergillosis of the Central Nervous System can include meningitis, brain abscess, stroke, seizures, hydrocephalus, and coma. In rare cases, death can occur.

Risk Factors

  • Weakened immune system
  • Diabetes
  • Lung diseases, such as COPD, asthma, and tuberculosis
  • Organ transplant
  • Cancer
  • Kidney failure
  • Living in a humid environment
  • Exposure to Aspergillus spores in the dust or air
#Disease
10 views

Related Questions

Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The Italian banking system became the model for those North European nations that would achieve the greatest commercial success in the coming centuries, notably the Dutch, the English, and the Swedes. It was in Amsterdam, London and Stockholm that the next decisive wave of financial or innovation occurred, as the forerunners of modern central banks made their first appearance. The seventeenth century saw the foundation of three distinctly novel institutions that, in their differen in ways, were intended to serve a public as well as a private financial function. The Amsterdam Exchange Bank, i.e. the Wisselbank, was set up in 1609 to resolve the practical problems created for merchants by the circulation of multiple currencies in the United Provinces, where there were no fewer than fourteen different mints and copious quantities of foreign coins. By allowing merchants to set up accounts denominated in a standardized currency, the Exchange Bank pioneered the system of cheques and direct debits or transfers that we take for granted today. This allowed more and more commercial transactions to take place without the need for the sums involved to materialize in actual coins. Financial historians disagree as to how far the growth of banking after the seventeenth century can be credited with the acceleration of economic growth that began in Britain in the late eighteenth 20 5 century and then spread to Western Europe, North America and Australasia. But banks played a more important role in continental European industrialization than they did in England's.a) Where did the precursors of modern central banks make their first appearance? b) What practical problem was the Wisselbank required to resolve in its initial days?c) How did the Amsterdam Exchange Bank respond to the demand of the age? d) What are the points of disagreement among the financial historians with respect to growth of banking vis-a-vis growth of economy? e) Choose a suitable title for above composition.
1 Answers 5 Views
Write a precis of the following paragraph and provide a title:The stated intention of most regulators is to maintain stability within the financial services sector, thereby protecting the consumers whom banks serve and the 'real' economy which the industry supports. Every shock to the financial system must result in casualties. Left to itself, natural selection should work fast to eliminate the weakest institution in the market, which typically are gobbled up by the successful. But most crises also usher in new rules and regulations, as legislators and regulators rush to stabilize the financial system and to protect consumers who are also voters. The critical point is that the possibility of extinction cannot and should not be removed by excessively precautionary rules. As Joseph Schumpeter wrote more than seventy years ago, 'This economic system cannot do without the ultima ratio of the complete destruction of those existences which are irretrievably associated with the hopelessly unadapted.' This meant, in his view, nothing less than the disappearance of 'those firms which are unfit to live'. It remains to be seen whether the extraordinary measures taken by Western governments since September 2008 will have the desired effect of preventing complete breakdown of the financial system or whether they will in fact end up impeding the process of financial evolution.
1 Answers 5 Views