Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Stage III epithelial ovarian cancer following initial surgical resection

Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Following Initial Surgical Resection

Stage III epithelial ovarian cancer is a serious condition that occurs when cancer spreads to other organs near the ovaries. It requires immediate medical attention and is best treated with surgical resection, which involves removing the affected organs and possibly other organs in the area. After the initial surgical resection, patients can often expect to receive chemotherapy and radiation therapy to help further treat the cancer.

Stage III epithelial ovarian cancer is most common in women over the age of 50 and is more common in women with a family history of the disease. It is not usually diagnosed until it has reached an advanced stage, which can affect the chances of survival.

The main initial treatment for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer is surgery. The aim of the surgery is to remove the affected organs and as much of the cancer as possible. If the affected organs are too close to the vagina or bladder, a hysterectomy may be necessary. This also means that fertility is not possible afterwards.

In addition to surgery, chemotherapy and radiation are commonly used to help reduce the tumor size and remove any remaining cancer cells.

Benefits of Surgery

The primary benefit of surgery to treat stage III epithelial ovarian cancer is that it provides a chance to remove as much of the cancer as possible from the body. This is important in order to improve the chance of further treatment being successful.

Surgery also enables the removal of large areas of tumor, which may alleviate some pressure on surrounding organs. This can also help to reduce the risk of the cancer spreading further.

Possible Side Effects and Risks of Surgery

As with any surgery, there are risks associated with performing a procedure to treat stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. The most common risks are infection, bleeding, complications from anesthesia, and organ damage.

In addition, there are possible side effects of the surgery such as pain, discomfort, fatigue, and nausea. These can vary greatly in intensity and may require additional medical attention.

Long-Term Effects of Surgery

The long-term effects of surgery to treat stage III epithelial ovarian cancer depend on the extent of the surgery and the stage of the cancer. Treatment may have a positive or negative impact on fertility and overall health.

In addition, surgery may cause short-term discomfort which could lead to longer-term psychological effects. Therefore, it is important to discuss possible long-term effects with your doctor prior to undergoing any treatment.

Summary

Stage III epithelial ovarian cancer is a serious condition that requires immediate medical attention. The main treatment for this condition is surgery, with the aim of removing the affected organs and as much of the cancer as possible. After surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy will usually follow, to reduce the tumor size and remove any remaining cancer cells.

Surgery is an important part of treating stage III epithelial ovarian cancer and offers a chance to reduce the tumor size and remove cancer cells. However, as with all surgeries, there are risks and side effects that should be carefully considered. It is important to discuss all the possible long-term effects with your doctor before proceeding with any treatment.

#Disease
6 views

Related Questions

Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The Italian banking system became the model for those North European nations that would achieve the greatest commercial success in the coming centuries, notably the Dutch, the English, and the Swedes. It was in Amsterdam, London and Stockholm that the next decisive wave of financial or innovation occurred, as the forerunners of modern central banks made their first appearance. The seventeenth century saw the foundation of three distinctly novel institutions that, in their differen in ways, were intended to serve a public as well as a private financial function. The Amsterdam Exchange Bank, i.e. the Wisselbank, was set up in 1609 to resolve the practical problems created for merchants by the circulation of multiple currencies in the United Provinces, where there were no fewer than fourteen different mints and copious quantities of foreign coins. By allowing merchants to set up accounts denominated in a standardized currency, the Exchange Bank pioneered the system of cheques and direct debits or transfers that we take for granted today. This allowed more and more commercial transactions to take place without the need for the sums involved to materialize in actual coins. Financial historians disagree as to how far the growth of banking after the seventeenth century can be credited with the acceleration of economic growth that began in Britain in the late eighteenth 20 5 century and then spread to Western Europe, North America and Australasia. But banks played a more important role in continental European industrialization than they did in England's.a) Where did the precursors of modern central banks make their first appearance? b) What practical problem was the Wisselbank required to resolve in its initial days?c) How did the Amsterdam Exchange Bank respond to the demand of the age? d) What are the points of disagreement among the financial historians with respect to growth of banking vis-a-vis growth of economy? e) Choose a suitable title for above composition.
1 Answers 5 Views
Write a precis of the following paragraph and provide a title:The stated intention of most regulators is to maintain stability within the financial services sector, thereby protecting the consumers whom banks serve and the 'real' economy which the industry supports. Every shock to the financial system must result in casualties. Left to itself, natural selection should work fast to eliminate the weakest institution in the market, which typically are gobbled up by the successful. But most crises also usher in new rules and regulations, as legislators and regulators rush to stabilize the financial system and to protect consumers who are also voters. The critical point is that the possibility of extinction cannot and should not be removed by excessively precautionary rules. As Joseph Schumpeter wrote more than seventy years ago, 'This economic system cannot do without the ultima ratio of the complete destruction of those existences which are irretrievably associated with the hopelessly unadapted.' This meant, in his view, nothing less than the disappearance of 'those firms which are unfit to live'. It remains to be seen whether the extraordinary measures taken by Western governments since September 2008 will have the desired effect of preventing complete breakdown of the financial system or whether they will in fact end up impeding the process of financial evolution.
1 Answers 5 Views