Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Sinusitis following surgery or injury about it

Sinusitis Following Surgery or Injury

Sinusitis, or inflammation of the sinuses, can occur following surgery or an injury. People who have had surgery involving their head and face are particularly at risk for developing sinusitis. Sinusitis can cause pain, nasal congestion, fatigue, difficulty breathing, and other symptoms. It is important to understand the causes of sinusitis and the treatment options available to help manage the condition.

Causes of Sinusitis Following Surgery or Injury

Surgery or an injury to the head and face can alter the natural pathways of the sinuses, leading to sinus blockage. During surgery, the structures that normally protect the sinuses can be damaged, resulting in swelling and an increased risk of infection. Furthermore, infection can occur if bacteria are introduced into the sinuses during surgery or through an open wound. If allowed to remain in the sinuses, infection can cause inflammation of the sinuses, leading to sinusitis.

Symptoms of Sinusitis

The symptoms of sinusitis can vary depending on the severity of the inflammation. Common symptoms include:

  • Headache or facial pain
  • Nasal congestion
  • Decreased sense of smell
  • Fever
  • Thick yellow or green nasal discharge
  • Cough
  • Fatigue

Treating Sinusitis Following Surgery or Injury

Sinusitis following surgery or an injury is usually treated with antibiotics to help clear the infection. In some cases, anti-inflammatory medications or steroids may be prescribed to reduce swelling and relieve symptoms. If the infection does not respond to antibiotics, surgery may be recommended to remove any blockages or repair any damaged structures in the sinuses. Severe cases may require hospitalization in order to ensure the infection can be adequately treated.

#Disease
5 views

Related Questions

Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The Italian banking system became the model for those North European nations that would achieve the greatest commercial success in the coming centuries, notably the Dutch, the English, and the Swedes. It was in Amsterdam, London and Stockholm that the next decisive wave of financial or innovation occurred, as the forerunners of modern central banks made their first appearance. The seventeenth century saw the foundation of three distinctly novel institutions that, in their differen in ways, were intended to serve a public as well as a private financial function. The Amsterdam Exchange Bank, i.e. the Wisselbank, was set up in 1609 to resolve the practical problems created for merchants by the circulation of multiple currencies in the United Provinces, where there were no fewer than fourteen different mints and copious quantities of foreign coins. By allowing merchants to set up accounts denominated in a standardized currency, the Exchange Bank pioneered the system of cheques and direct debits or transfers that we take for granted today. This allowed more and more commercial transactions to take place without the need for the sums involved to materialize in actual coins. Financial historians disagree as to how far the growth of banking after the seventeenth century can be credited with the acceleration of economic growth that began in Britain in the late eighteenth 20 5 century and then spread to Western Europe, North America and Australasia. But banks played a more important role in continental European industrialization than they did in England's.a) Where did the precursors of modern central banks make their first appearance? b) What practical problem was the Wisselbank required to resolve in its initial days?c) How did the Amsterdam Exchange Bank respond to the demand of the age? d) What are the points of disagreement among the financial historians with respect to growth of banking vis-a-vis growth of economy? e) Choose a suitable title for above composition.
1 Answers 5 Views
Write a precis of the following paragraph and provide a title:The stated intention of most regulators is to maintain stability within the financial services sector, thereby protecting the consumers whom banks serve and the 'real' economy which the industry supports. Every shock to the financial system must result in casualties. Left to itself, natural selection should work fast to eliminate the weakest institution in the market, which typically are gobbled up by the successful. But most crises also usher in new rules and regulations, as legislators and regulators rush to stabilize the financial system and to protect consumers who are also voters. The critical point is that the possibility of extinction cannot and should not be removed by excessively precautionary rules. As Joseph Schumpeter wrote more than seventy years ago, 'This economic system cannot do without the ultima ratio of the complete destruction of those existences which are irretrievably associated with the hopelessly unadapted.' This meant, in his view, nothing less than the disappearance of 'those firms which are unfit to live'. It remains to be seen whether the extraordinary measures taken by Western governments since September 2008 will have the desired effect of preventing complete breakdown of the financial system or whether they will in fact end up impeding the process of financial evolution.
1 Answers 5 Views