i. Can the MD be held punishable for his act? ii. Under which Doctrine can Mr. X take action against the company?
Study the following case and express your opinion:
The Articles of a company stated that while borrowing any money from outsiders, the document must have the signatures of the Managing Director (MD) and any one of the Director. The Articles of Association clearly stated the procedure to be followed while borrowing money. The Managing Director did not follow all the procedures but still borrowed money from Mr. X. Mr. X assumed that the MD has followed the required procedures.
i. Can the MD be held punishable for his act?
ii. Under which Doctrine can Mr. X take action against the company?
iii. Explain the Doctrine.
1 Answers
i. He can be held liable for his actions and can be insisted to pay back the loan amount.
ii. Under Doctrine of Indoor Management
iii.
- According to this doctrine, persons dealing with the company need not inquire whether internal proceedings relating to the contract are correctly followed.
- They are satisfied that the transactions are in accordance with the memorandum and articles of association.
- If there are any internal irregularities then the company will be liable as the person has acted in good faith and he did not know about the internal arrangement of the company.
- Similarly with X as he has acted in good faith and lent money to the managing director, but the managing director did not follow the procedure. So there is an irregularity that can make the director liable for his actions.