Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. (A), (B) and (C) only
  2. (A), (B) and (D) only
  3. (A), (B), (C) and (D) only
  4. (B), (C) and (D) only
7 views

1 Answers

Option 3 : (A), (B), (C) and (D) only

The correct answer is (A), (B), (C) and (D) only

 Section 271 of Companies Act 2013

Circumstances in which company may be wound up by Tribunal:

A company may, on a petition under section 272, be wound up by the Tribunal

  •  if the company is unable to pay its debts.
  • if the company has, by special resolution, resolved that the company be wound up by the Tribunal;
  • if the company has acted against the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality.
  •  if the Tribunal has ordered the winding up of the company under Chapter XIX.
  •  if on an application made by the Registrar or any other person authorised by the Central Government by notification under this Act, the Tribunal is of the opinion that the affairs of the company have been conducted in a fraudulent manner or the company was formed for fraudulent and unlawful purpose or the persons concerned in the formation or management of its affairs have been guilty of fraud, misfeasance or misconduct in connection therewith and that it is proper that the company be wound up.
  • if the company has made a default in filing with the Registrar its financial statements or annual returns for immediately preceding five consecutive financial years; or
  • if the Tribunal is of the opinion that it is just and equitable that the company should be wound up.
7 views

Related Questions

Two statements are followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. Fraud-hit Punjab National (PNB) today said it has no plans to close operations at its Brady House branch, the fountainhead of the Rs. 14,000 crore Nirav Modi scam. II. Modi and his uncle Mehul Choksi, in connivance with certain bank officials, allegedly cheated PNB of about Rs. 14,000 crore through issuance of fraudulent Letters of Undertaking (LoUs).  Conclusions: I. PNB's Brady House branch in Mumbai had fraudulently issued LoUs for the group of companies belonging to Nirav Modi since March 2011. PNB has no plans to close operations in the Brady House branch in Mumbai. II. Reallocation of some of the accounts is part of the regular restructuring process at PNB to strengthen internal systems and processes and centralize certain critical functions  III. With regards to provision made for the loss incurred on account of the Nirav Modi fraud, the bank provided Rs. 7,178 crore, 50 per cent of the total amount of Rs. 14,356 crore, in the fourth quarter of 2017-18. The remaining amount will be covered in the three quarters of the current fiscal year.?
1 Answers 5 Views
Match List I with List II: List I (Method) List II (Purchase consideration) (A) Lump-sum payment method (I) Calculated by adding up the total amount (money value) of existing shares, preference shares and cash received from the purchasing company for the shareholders of the vendor company. (B) Net Assets Method (II) On the basis of ratio in which the shares of the transferee company are to be exchanged for the shares of the transferor company. (C) Net Payment Method (III) The amount to be paid by the transferee company to transferor company for amalgamation of its business. (D) Swap Ratio Method (IV) Arrived at by adding the agreed value of assets taken over and deducting there from the agreed values of liabilities. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:?
1 Answers 7 Views
Which of the following distinction(s) is/are not correct between public issue and rights issue (A) In public issue, applications for shares are invited from the general public and in rights issue, the shares are offered to existing shareholders. (B) In public issue there is no question of any over-subscription and in rights issue the shares may be under subscribed or over subscribed leading to prorata allotment. (C) The price of public issue is generally less than the market price and in rights issue, the price is deliberately made less than the market price. (D) In a public issue, the communication of the issue is through prospectus or advertisements and in a rights issue the communication is between the company and the existing members of the company. Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:?
1 Answers 6 Views