In March 2020, Scientists from which institute have developed a starch-based ‘hemostat’ material?

National Institute of Science Education and Research
Institute of Nano Science and Technology
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research
Homi Bhabha National Institute

LohaHridoy

4 views

2025-01-04 04:42

1 Answers

AhmedNazir

Option 2 : Institute of Nano Science and Technology

Scientists from the Institute of Nano Science and Technology (INST) have developed a starch-based ‘hemostat’ material.
It concentrates the natural clotting factors in blood by physically absorbing excess fluid.
The biodegradable microparticles that combine to form a gel on a wound offer significant improvements over existing alternatives.

4 views Answered 2022-09-04 04:29

Related Questions

In the following question, some parts of the sentence may error. Find out which part of the sentence has an error and select the appropriate option. If a sentence is free from error, select ‘No Error’. Evidence from 30,000 years ago in Europe (1)/ reveal starch residue on rocks (2)/ used for pounding plants. (3)/ No Error (4)?

1 Answers 4 Views

Scientists of which country have developed working human skeletal muscle from stem cells in the laboratory for the first time?

1 Answers 4 Views

Which of the following enzymes of the digestive system breaks down starch into sugar?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question below are given four statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All Woman are Man. Some Woman are March. All March are April. No March is Sunday. Conclusions: I. Some Woman are April. II. Some March are Man. III. Some April are Sunday?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the following question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement: (I) 28 athletes are facing legal cases due to doping incidents. (II) The new wave of Olympic doping cases is based on evidences. Conclusions: (I) The report of doping is based on the test that happen. (II) Doping practice is very common these days among athletes.?

1 Answers 6 Views

In the question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. You have to assume everything given in the statement to be true and then decide which of the given/ suggested courses of action logically follows for pursuing. Statement: One of the problems of the public food- processing industry is the irregular supply of raw material to other industries also. Courses of Action: The government should deregulate the supply of raw material for the food processing industry. The government should announce an attractive package to ensure regular supply of raw material. The producers of raw material are not getting a reasonable price?

1 Answers 4 Views

Engines are rated at specified conditions. Then which of the following statements are correct 1. Power developed increases as local temperature increases. 2. Power developed increases as local temperature decreases 3. Power developed is not dependent on local temperature. 4. Power developed increases as local atmospheric pressure increases. 5. Power developed increases as local atmospheric pressure decreases.?

1 Answers 5 Views

In March 2020, which of the following has/have been recognised by the Ethisphere Institute, as one of the world’s most ethical companies?

1 Answers 4 Views

In March 2020, the scientists of CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology in which state have developed a new hand-sanitizer as per the guidelines of the World Health Organization?

1 Answers 5 Views

Three Statements followed by three Conclusions are given below. You have to take the Statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read all the Conclusions and then decide which of the given Conclusions logically follows/ follow from the Statements, disregarding the commonly known facts: Statement-1 : Some doctors are teachers. Statement-2 : All teachers are engineers. Statement-3 : All engineers are scientists. Conclusion-I : Some scientists are doctors. Conclusion-II : All engineers are doctors. Conclusion-III : Some engineers are doctors. Which one of the following is correct?

1 Answers 4 Views

এক্সাম দিয়ে মেধা যাচাই করুন

Job Preparation (1125)

Admission (754)

এসএসসি (10)

এইচএসসি (5)