Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. 1 only
  2. 2 only
  3. 1, 2 and 3
  4. 2 and 3 only
4 views

1 Answers

Option 3 : 1, 2 and 3

The correct answer is option 3) 1,2 and 3

  • Eco-Radical is an organization of domestic terrorists who perform illegal activities sometimes to protect the earth.
  • They follow an "Earth First! " policy.
  • It is a new kind of environmental activism which is uncompromising and discontented with traditional conservation policy in a legal way.
  • it is group of educated and resourceful people; they believe human race should be singled out to keep rest of the creatures on earth safe and alive.
  • Hence, option 3 which contains all the statements is correct.
4 views

Related Questions

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: World’s largest beer maker Heineken NV, the majority partner of United Breweries with Vijay Mallya, is understood to have sought legal opinion over its right to appoint a chairman at the Indian company. Heineken and some of its advisers believe that the shareholder agreement between Mallya and the beer giant has become null and void after India’s Enforcement Directorate attached his shares as part of its legal action against the liquor baron. Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner Arguments: I. UBL has stopped sharing confidential information with Mallya and has said that he is no longer privy to any strategic developments.  II. The board of UBL, India’s biggest beer company, had asked Mallya to either step down or appoint a nominee after the Securities and Exchange Board of India barred wilful defaulters from holding key board positions last year.  III. The company is functioning well and operations are in good shape but it is not good corporate governance to have an acting chairman for so long.?
1 Answers 7 Views
In the question below, a statement followed by two courses of actions numbered I and II are given. A course of action is a step or administrative decision to be taken for improvement, follow-up or further action in regard to the problem, policy, etc. On the basis of the information given in the statement to be true, then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: The number of cases of sexual harassment against women has increased in the workplaces. Courses of action: I. More strict rules regarding the safety of women must be made like they must be provided with cab services, especially for night shifts employees. II. Regular meeting with the women employees to ensure the treatment of male employees towards them and strict actions must be taken against anyone found guilty.?
1 Answers 4 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should birth control be made a little more strict in India Arguments: I. Yes. Considering the excessive population growth and the problem of unemployment, it is the best option. II. No. There are people belonging to different cultures in India and some of them do not approve of birth control techniques.?
1 Answers 4 Views