Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. Only 1 is incorrect
  2. Only 2 is incorrect
  3. Both are incorrect
  4. Both are correct
4 views

1 Answers

Option 1 : Only 1 is incorrect

The correct answer is 1 i.e. Only 1 is incorrect.

Council of ministers:

  • It is a wider body consisting of 60 to 70 ministers.
  • It includes all the three categories of ministers, i.e. cabinet ministers, ministers of state, and deputy ministers.
  • It does not meet, as a body, to transact government business. It has no collective functions.
  • It is vested with all powers but in theory.
  • Its functions are determined by the cabinet.
  • It implements the decisions taken by the cabinet.
  • It is a constitutional body, dealt in detail by the Articles 74 and 75 of the Constitution.
  • Its size and classification are, however, not mentioned in the Constitution.
  • Its size is determined by the prime minister according to the exigencies of the time and requirements of the situation.
  • Its classification into a three-tier body is based on the conventions of parliamentary government as developed in Britain.
  • It has, however, got a legislative sanction. Thus, the Salaries and Allowances Act of 1952 defines a ‘minister’ as a ‘member of the council of ministers, by whatever name called, and includes a deputy minister’.
  • It is collectively responsible to the Lower House of the Parliament.
4 views

Related Questions

In the question below, a statement and three assumptions numbered I, II and III are given. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. You have to consider the following assumption and decide which of the assumption is implicit in the statement. Statement: Online grocery firm Grofers today said it is entering the FMCG segment and is targeting an overall revenue of Rs 2,500 crore by FY19. Grofers closed FY 18 with Rs 950 crore of sales and is targeting for a stronger growth trajectory in 2019, with a 50 per cent contribution from its private brands. The company has launched seven new brands under two categories Budget and Popular G-Brands.  Assumptions: I. With this, Grofers private labels expands to 250 food and non-food products for its consumers. With this significant business expansion, Grofers aims to drive the next wave of growth for e-commerce sector by bringing the next 100 million customers to its platform. II. This vertical expansion is key to drive Grofers next phase of growth in India. In the last five years, we have received an overwhelming response from our customers. III. Through many industry-first initiatives, Grofers has been instrumental in bringing new customers to the e-commerce fold with increase of its customer base. ?
1 Answers 5 Views
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: World’s largest beer maker Heineken NV, the majority partner of United Breweries with Vijay Mallya, is understood to have sought legal opinion over its right to appoint a chairman at the Indian company. Heineken and some of its advisers believe that the shareholder agreement between Mallya and the beer giant has become null and void after India’s Enforcement Directorate attached his shares as part of its legal action against the liquor baron. Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner Arguments: I. UBL has stopped sharing confidential information with Mallya and has said that he is no longer privy to any strategic developments.  II. The board of UBL, India’s biggest beer company, had asked Mallya to either step down or appoint a nominee after the Securities and Exchange Board of India barred wilful defaulters from holding key board positions last year.  III. The company is functioning well and operations are in good shape but it is not good corporate governance to have an acting chairman for so long.?
1 Answers 7 Views
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong' arguments and which is/are ‘weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement:  The central government has told the Supreme Court that anti-adultery laws were required to protect the ‘sanctity of marriage and the institution of family', and any attempt to do away with these laws would hurt ‘Indian ethos'. The government was responding to a court notice on a public interest litigation which wanted the law struck down as it was not gender neutral and the provisions were tilted against men. Which among the following arguments support the above statement regarding the ‘revision of such laws' in the best possible manner Arguments: I. It seemed to suggest that women were chattel owned by men and could be guided and misguided. II. This would erode the sanctity of marriage as an institution and the societal fabric. The issue of making the provision gender neutral was already pending before the government. III. Any step towards decriminalising the offence in the interim would be detrimental to Indian ethos which gives paramount importance to the institution and sanctity of marriage.?
1 Answers 4 Views