Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. 1 only
  2. 2 only 
  3. Both 1 and 2
  4. Neither 1 nor 2
4 views

1 Answers

Option 3 : Both 1 and 2

The Correct Answer is Option 3 i.e Both 1 and 2.

  • Town planning in British India in the early 19th century:
    • The work of town planning was carried on by the Lottery Committee (1817) with the help of the government.
    • The funds for town improvement were raised through public lotteries.
    • The threats of epidemics also gave an impetus to town planning in the next few decades.
    • Frequent fires also led to stricter building regulations like for example thatched huts were banned in 1836 and tiled roofs were made mandatory.
4 views

Related Questions

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong' arguments and which is/are ‘weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement:  The central government has told the Supreme Court that anti-adultery laws were required to protect the ‘sanctity of marriage and the institution of family', and any attempt to do away with these laws would hurt ‘Indian ethos'. The government was responding to a court notice on a public interest litigation which wanted the law struck down as it was not gender neutral and the provisions were tilted against men. Which among the following arguments support the above statement regarding the ‘revision of such laws' in the best possible manner Arguments: I. It seemed to suggest that women were chattel owned by men and could be guided and misguided. II. This would erode the sanctity of marriage as an institution and the societal fabric. The issue of making the provision gender neutral was already pending before the government. III. Any step towards decriminalising the offence in the interim would be detrimental to Indian ethos which gives paramount importance to the institution and sanctity of marriage.?
1 Answers 4 Views
In each of the following questions, two statements numbered I and II are given. There may be cause and effect relationship between the two statements. These two statements may be the effect of the same cause or independent causes. These statements may be independent causes without having any relationship. Read both the statements in each question and mark your answer. Statements: I. Hotel Leela venture, which currently has a debt of over Rs. 3,600 crore, had issued secured redeemable non-convertible debentures on private placement basis aggregating to Rs. 90 crores to LIC in December, 2008. II. Hotel Leela venture’s "operating cash flows are not sufficient to service its term loans and NCDs and the funds of the company are escrowed with its lenders and are also monitored by the lenders".?
1 Answers 6 Views
Which of the following distinction(s) is/are not correct between public issue and rights issue (A) In public issue, applications for shares are invited from the general public and in rights issue, the shares are offered to existing shareholders. (B) In public issue there is no question of any over-subscription and in rights issue the shares may be under subscribed or over subscribed leading to prorata allotment. (C) The price of public issue is generally less than the market price and in rights issue, the price is deliberately made less than the market price. (D) In a public issue, the communication of the issue is through prospectus or advertisements and in a rights issue the communication is between the company and the existing members of the company. Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:?
1 Answers 6 Views