On which of the following parameters are the slow sand filters better than rapid sand filters?
1 Answers
Option 1 : Ease of construction
|
|
Slow sand filter |
Rapid sand filter |
|
Pre-treatment |
Effluents from plain sedimentation coagulation, not req. |
Coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation is the must. |
|
Filter Sand |
D10 b/w 0.2 and 0.4 mm Cu ⇒ 1.8 to 3. Gravel -30-75 cm thick |
D10 = 0.35 mm - 0.55 mm Cu = 1.2 to 1.8 Gravel-60-90 cm thick |
|
Size of each unit |
Large such as 30m × 60 m. An area from 100-2000 m2. Less flexible on shock loading |
Small 5m × 8m. Area < 100m2 More flexible on shock loading |
|
Rate of filtration |
100 to 200 litres/hr/m2 |
3000 to 6000 L/hr/m2 |
|
Efficiency |
Very efficient in removing bacteria but less efficient in removing colour. |
Less efficient in bacteria (80-90%), very efficient in colour removal. |
|
Post-treatment |
Disinfection is not must. Almost pure water obtained. Turbidity removal up to 50 ppm |
Disinfection is the must. Turbidity up to 35 ppm. |
|
Method of cleaning |
Scrapping and removing the top 1.5 to 3 cm thick layer and washing down by hoses. |
Backwashing with or without compressed air.
|
|
Qty of wash water req. |
0.2 to 0.6% of total filtered water is req. in every 1 to 3 months |
A large amount of total filtered water is req. in every 1 to 3 days. (1-5%) |