Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. Basket ball
  2. Boxing
  3. Chess
  4. Football
4 views

1 Answers

Option 2 : Boxing

The correct answer is Boxing.

  • Jab term is related to boxing.

  • A jab is a type of punch used in boxing and martial arts.
  • Several variations of the jab exist, but every jab shares these characteristics: while in a fighting stance, the lead fist is thrown straight ahead and the arm is fully extended.
  • Terminologies used in boxing are Knock out, Roundhouse punch, Hook, Uppercut, Kidney punch, Timing, Footwork, southpaw, sparer.

 

  • Terminologies used in basketball are Free Throw, Technical Foul, Common Foul, Under Head, Overhead, etc.
  • Terminologies used in chess are E.L.O. rating, international Master, Grand Master, Gambit, Kings Indian Defence, etc.
  • Terminologies used in football are Goal, Kick, Head, Penalty kick, Dribble, Offside, Hat trick, Foul, Left out, Right out, Stopper, Defender, Move, Side back, Pass, Baseline, Rebound, Comer bick, etc.
4 views

Related Questions

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Is it advantageous to hold elections simultaneously for parliament and the state assemblies Argument: I: Yes, this way ensures election expenditure is reduced. II: No, Parties are held accountable through frequent elections, which will lose it purpose through joint elections.?
1 Answers 4 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below are followed by two arguments each numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the two arguments is the strong argument and which is the weak argument. Statement: Should water be privatised in India Arguments: I. Yes. Private sectors are more efficient than public sector which would lead to improved water distribution. II. No. Privatisation will make distribution of water profit centric which would increase the cost of water. Not everyone would be able to afford water at high prices.?
1 Answers 5 Views