Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. The 62-year-old liquor baron, who fled the country on March 2, 2016, has been living in London since then despite summons from Indian courts and law enforcement agencies to appear before them for trial in various related cases. 
  2. When I have placed assets on the table before the Karnataka High Court in excess of the bank claims, how can Mallya be an economic offender? The fugitive part falls away.
  3. The government wants to recover money loaned by the state-run banks. It used CBI and ED to attach and recover. Mallya has placed all assets before the high court and submitted for sale. Banks should be very happy.
  4. Regretting that the official narrative seemed to question his intentions, Mallya also denied delaying tactics or any agenda to score brownie points.
  5. None can be inferred.
4 views

1 Answers

Option 4 : Regretting that the official narrative seemed to question his intentions, Mallya also denied delaying tactics or any agenda to score brownie points.

The correct answer is option 4, i.e. Regretting that the official narrative seemed to question his intentions, Mallya also denied delaying tactics or any agenda to score brownie points. 

Statements (1) , (2) and (3) can be easily rejected as there is no evidence of the date when the liquor baron fled the country, or someone claiming him to be an ‘economic offender’ or the government’s plan to recover money loaned by the state-run banks respectively. Because of the fact that no inference can be made on the data that is not present in the given statement, we cannot make inferences on our own. (4) can be inferred from the given statement though, it is not a very impressive inference but among the options stated, it seems to be the only one that is correct and in the same direction.

Rest of the statements mentioned can be rejected and thus, the most appropriate answer is option 4.
4 views

Related Questions

A statement is given below in the question followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: Jet Airways has defaulted on salary payments again. The cash-strapped airline on Wednesday sought over 10 more days from its employees to pay balance 25 per cent of their salaries for August. Jet Airways had paid 50 per cent of August salaries to its employees on September 11 and the rest was to be paid on Wednesday. But it could pay only half of the balance amount.  Courses of action: I. The cash-strapped airline, which is struggling to meet its cost of operations, had earlier attempted to cut salaries of its employees, but the move was met with stiff resistance that forced it to defer the plan.  II. Jet Airways will today remit half of the second installment of pending emoluments of its pilots, AMEs and senior management for August 2018. III. While the management regrets the attendant inconvenience, it also appreciates the continued support and understanding of its employees.?
1 Answers 5 Views
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: World’s largest beer maker Heineken NV, the majority partner of United Breweries with Vijay Mallya, is understood to have sought legal opinion over its right to appoint a chairman at the Indian company. Heineken and some of its advisers believe that the shareholder agreement between Mallya and the beer giant has become null and void after India’s Enforcement Directorate attached his shares as part of its legal action against the liquor baron. Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner Arguments: I. UBL has stopped sharing confidential information with Mallya and has said that he is no longer privy to any strategic developments.  II. The board of UBL, India’s biggest beer company, had asked Mallya to either step down or appoint a nominee after the Securities and Exchange Board of India barred wilful defaulters from holding key board positions last year.  III. The company is functioning well and operations are in good shape but it is not good corporate governance to have an acting chairman for so long.?
1 Answers 7 Views