Which statements are CORRECT I. In early 1930’s Nylon was prepared from coal, water and air. II. Nylon was the first fully synthetic fibre. III. Nylon fibre was strong, elastic and light.?

Only I and II
Only I and III
Only II and III
All I, II and III

LohaHridoy

5 views

2025-01-04 04:42

1 Answers

AhmedNazir

Option 4 : All I, II and III

Nylon is a synthetic fibre. In early 1930’s Nylon was prepared from coal, water and air. Nylon was the first fully synthetic fibre. Nylon fibre was strong, elastic and light.

5 views Answered 2022-09-04 04:29

Related Questions

Which among the following statements are TRUE regarding synthetic fibre I. They melt after catching fire. II. They are more durable. III. They are prepared by a number of processes using petrochemicals.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the following question, four statements are given followed by four conclusions I, II, III and IV. You have to consider the given statements to be true even, if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and decide which of the following logically follows from the given statements disregarding the commonly known facts. Statements: All Planet are Sun. All Object are Air. All Planet are Earth. No Air is Sun. Conclusions: I. All Air being Earth is a possibility. II. Some Object are Sun. III. Some Earth are Sun. IV. No planet is Air.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question below are given six statements followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All Petrol are Gasoline. No petrol is Water. Some Water are Gas. Some Moisture are Gas. All Gasoline are Fire No Moisture is Fire Conclusions: I. Some Moisture are Gasoline. II. Some Water are Moisture. III. Some Gasoline are Gas. IV. Some Petrol are Moisture.?

1 Answers 5 Views

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which argument is strong and which is weak. Statement: Should the release of industrial wastes into water bodies be prohibited Arguments: I. Yes, because they lead to polluting water that causes some serious human and animal health problems. II. Yes, as they may further lead to global warming.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: I. All coal are black. II. All black are red. Conclusions: I. All coal are red. II. All red are coal. III. No red is coal.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below are followed by two arguments each numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the two arguments is the strong argument and which is the weak argument. Statement: Should water be privatised in India Arguments: I. Yes. Private sectors are more efficient than public sector which would lead to improved water distribution. II. No. Privatisation will make distribution of water profit centric which would increase the cost of water. Not everyone would be able to afford water at high prices.?

1 Answers 5 Views

Study the two cases and answer in terms of relation between the two cases Case 1: Two cans are filled with the mixture of milk and water. The first can contain 72% of water and second can contains 60% of water. A new mixture is prepared by taking 9 part of first can and 6 part of second can. The percentage of milk in the new mixture is Case 2: For testing, 80 ml of milk and water mixture is taken from a container which has 62% water by weight. If in the test tube, additional 20% water of the total water is added, then the % of milk in the test tube is?

1 Answers 6 Views

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should government avoid coal and look for more conventional energy sources Arguments: I. Yes. Burning of coal releases harmful pollutants. II. No. It is the cheapest form of electricity available for now. ?

1 Answers 5 Views

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should use of artificial fertilisers be banned Arguments: I. Yes. Over-use of fertilisers make land barren overtime and pollute water bodies. II. No. They give better results than natural fertilisers and improve growth. ?

1 Answers 5 Views

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should we plant more water purification plants Arguments: I. Yes. There is need of safer drinking water. II. No. The setup cost would be a burden on government. ?

1 Answers 5 Views

এক্সাম দিয়ে মেধা যাচাই করুন

Job Preparation (1125)

Admission (754)

এসএসসি (10)

এইচএসসি (5)