A recent study proved that children of drug addicts are more likely to become drug addicts, than the other children. The likelihood of this happening, is determined by which parent is the drug addict. This holds true, even if the children are separated from their parents at birth. Assuming this information is true, which of the following conclusions is most appropriate?

Question

A recent study proved that children of drug addicts are more likely to become drug addicts, than the other children. The likelihood of this happening, is determined by which parent is the drug addict. This holds true, even if the children are separated from their parents at birth. Assuming this information is true, which of the following conclusions is most appropriate?

Drug addiction is possibly linked to genetics.
If the mother is a drug addict, the tendency of the child becoming one, is greater.
Treating drug addiction is difficult, as it is an inherited disease.
None of the above.

LohaHridoy

5 views

2025-01-04 04:42

1 Answers

Related Questions

Ramesh has made a schedule of studying his seven subjects on each day. He decided to study maths on Friday and two days after it he will study English. He decided to study Science on Wednesday and after it Social Science. He decided not to study Arts on either Monday or Tuesday. 3 days before Friday he will study Hindi. He will study GK on someday as well. Which subject will he study on Thursday?

1 Answers 7 Views

Study the following information carefully and answer the question based on it. Some toffees are distributed among six children. Statements: 1) M has more toffees than S and T only. 2) H has more toffees than M. 3) R has less toffees than H, but more than W. Conclusions: I. S has the least number of toffees. II. R has the highest number of toffees. Which conclusion logically follows?

1 Answers 5 Views

The question below consists of a set of labelled sentences in which first and the last sentence is given. Out of the four options given, select the most logical order of the sentences to form a coherent paragraph. S1- Better standard of living for the family is one of the advantages of women/female education. P- An educated mother will earn as good as the father of the family and will look after the financial needs of her family in a much better way. Q- It doesn’t take a mathematician to conclude that a family relying on double wages is more content and happy than a family which relies on the income of a single parent. R- Women are more concerned about the health of their family than men and have a great sense of hygiene too. S- Two incomes under the same roof will improve the quality of living and also ensure better education and facilities to the children, not to mention that a happy family will ultimately lead to a happy society. S6- Even working women are constantly concerned about their family’s health and don’t compromise with it at any cost.?

1 Answers 7 Views

In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follow beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Give answer. Statement: Chicago is the most expensive city. Conclusions: I. Singapore is less expensive than Chicago. II. Angola is more expensive than Singapore.?

1 Answers 4 Views

It is often beneficial to find polyps or cancerous growths in their early stages, rather than later, as they become easier to treat, and the probability of recovery is more. Scientists believe that early identification will reduce cancer fatalities by at least 33%. Assuming the above information is true, which statement is the most appropriate ?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: India may become the second largest smartphone selling country in the world if the sales continue to grow at the current pace, said Raghu Reddy, head of category and online sales of Xiaomi India. Smartphone sales in 2017 grew around 10% in the country in 2017. "India could overtake the US market and become the second largest smartphone market globally after China at this rate of growth’,’ Reddy said adding that currently the growth is happening in the Rs. 10,000 to 20,000 price range. Courses of action: I. Xiaomi, is currently the largest selling smartphone in the country with a growth of over 300% in 2017. It currently has a market share of over 30% including online and offline sales. II. The company has ramped up its production facilities in the recent times in the country and now has six production facilities spread over Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh. III. Now the printed circuit board assembly (PCBA) used in smartphone, which accounts for 50% of the value of the phone, will be made in India?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follow beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Choose the appropriate option. Statement: Netflix, the online movie and sitcom streaming company, has had a 80% increase in subscriptions made by those below the age of 23, and a 60% increase in total subscriptions. Conclusions: I. Only 20% of Netflix’s subscribers, are above the age of 23 II. Netflix has become more popular now.?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the following sentence, a part of the sentence is underlined. Below are given alternatives to the underlined part, which may improve the sentence. Choose the correct alternative. In case no improvement is needed, choose the alternative that indicates No improvement needed. Indian singer Zubeen Garg would be honoured with the 'Hero to Animals Award' from People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) India from his recent appeal to end animal sacrifice at the Kamakhya Temple in Assam. (A) For his recent appeal (B) To his recent appeal (C) On his recent appeal?

1 Answers 4 Views

Two processes X and Y need to access a critical section. Consider the following synchronization construct used by both the processes Process /* other code for process */ while(true) { varP = true; while(varQ == true) { /* Critical Section */ varP = false; } } /* other code for process */ Process /* other code for process */ while(true) { varQ = true; while(varP == true) { /* Critical Section */ varQ = false; } } /* other code for process */ Here, varP and varQ are shared variables and both are initialized to false. Which one of the following statements is true?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the following question below are given two statements followed by two conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: I. Some More is Less. II. Only Less is Small. Conclusions: I. All Less being More is a possibility. II. Some Small is More.?

1 Answers 5 Views

AhmedNazir · Accepted Answer · 2022-09-04T04:29:57+06:00

Option 1 : Drug addiction is possibly linked to genetics.

Option 1 is correct as it is mentioned that it is true 'even if the children are separated from their parents at birth'. It means that there is a connection on some level, between drug addiction and genetics. Option 2 is an assumption that cannot be concluded from the paragraph given. Option 3 is also an invalid conclusion, as nowhere in the paragraph is anything about the treatment of the disease, mentioned.

Hence, option 1 is correct.