Many protein bars often contain protein supplements embedded in them, and sometimes provide upto 99% of the protein required. Nevertheless, a well balanced diet, which has an appropriate amount of all nutrients, is key to living a healthy life. Which of the options would support this statement, the best?

Question

Many protein bars often contain protein supplements embedded in them, and sometimes provide upto 99% of the protein required. Nevertheless, a well balanced diet, which has an appropriate amount of all nutrients, is key to living a healthy life. Which of the options would support this statement, the best?

In many foods, the natural combination of proteins with other nutrients makes those proteins more usable by the body than are proteins added in protein supplements.
Foods are often processed with excess protein, as before processing, they lack the desired amount of protein.
Bars rich in proteins are just as easy to digest, as bars that are not.
None of the above.

LohaHridoy

5 views

2025-01-04 04:42

1 Answers

Related Questions

Below are given statements followed by four conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they appear to be at variance with commonly known facts, and then decide which of conclusions logically follows from the given statements. For each question, mark out an appropriate answer choice that you think is correct. Statements: Some vitamins are proteins. Some proteins are nutrients. All nutrients are healthy. No healthy is virus. Some viruses are illness. Conclusions: I. Some vitamins are healthy. II. Some proteins are healthy. III. Some healthy are virus.?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: Some diet contain protein. Statement II: Some proteins are healthy. Conclusion I: Some diets are healthy. Conclusion II: No diet is healthy.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. Statement: A healthy diet and exercise are important for a healthy lifestyle. Arguments: I: Yes, eating healthy and being more physically active helps in maintaining a healthy weight. II: No, besides these two components, there are other components too which lead to a better lifestyle.?

1 Answers 8 Views

A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement. Statement: Books without knowledge of life are useless. Inferences: I. All books contain knowledge of life. II. People should try to gain the knowledge of life.?

1 Answers 5 Views

The first and the last parts of the sentence/paragraph are numbered 1 and 6. The rest of the sentences are split into four parts and A, B, C and D. These four parts are not given in their order. Read the sentence/paragraph and find out which of the four combinations is correct. Honesty is the best policy means being honest and According to the saying of honesty is the best policy, one should be loyal and tell the truth always in his/her life true all through the life even in bad situations is considered as honesty is the best policy. while answering to any question or dilemma to anyone. 6. Being honest, loyal and true in the life provides mental peace to the person.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: Starting October, all new cars will have pedestrian safety features, including new design of the bonnet, to reduce impact on pedestrians during accidents. Advanced safety features are needed in all vehicles in India as vehicle safety cannot be confined to luxury vehicles only. Around 1.5 lakh people are killed in road accidents every year in the country, nearly 60% of them are pedestrians. Courses of action: I. The government has set a target to reduce the number of road deaths by half in the next two years. The ministry of road transport and highways has been issuing new safety standards for the automobiles along with eliminating the black spots on national highways. II. By next month, all new cars will have pedestrian safety feature, including new design of the bonnet, to reduce impact on pedestrians during accidents. III. Ministry of road transport and Highways is planning to implement all safety features in vehicles with active support of vehicle manufacturers. Electronic stability control (ESC) and autonomous emergency braking (AEB) will be incorporated in new vehicles by 2022.?

1 Answers 6 Views

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: World’s largest beer maker Heineken NV, the majority partner of United Breweries with Vijay Mallya, is understood to have sought legal opinion over its right to appoint a chairman at the Indian company. Heineken and some of its advisers believe that the shareholder agreement between Mallya and the beer giant has become null and void after India’s Enforcement Directorate attached his shares as part of its legal action against the liquor baron. Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner Arguments: I. UBL has stopped sharing confidential information with Mallya and has said that he is no longer privy to any strategic developments. II. The board of UBL, India’s biggest beer company, had asked Mallya to either step down or appoint a nominee after the Securities and Exchange Board of India barred wilful defaulters from holding key board positions last year. III. The company is functioning well and operations are in good shape but it is not good corporate governance to have an acting chairman for so long.?

1 Answers 7 Views

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong' arguments and which is/are ‘weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: The central government has told the Supreme Court that anti-adultery laws were required to protect the ‘sanctity of marriage and the institution of family', and any attempt to do away with these laws would hurt ‘Indian ethos'. The government was responding to a court notice on a public interest litigation which wanted the law struck down as it was not gender neutral and the provisions were tilted against men. Which among the following arguments support the above statement regarding the ‘revision of such laws' in the best possible manner Arguments: I. It seemed to suggest that women were chattel owned by men and could be guided and misguided. II. This would erode the sanctity of marriage as an institution and the societal fabric. The issue of making the provision gender neutral was already pending before the government. III. Any step towards decriminalising the offence in the interim would be detrimental to Indian ethos which gives paramount importance to the institution and sanctity of marriage.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the following question, some part of the sentence may have errors. Find out which part of the sentence has errors and select the appropriate option. If a sentence is free from error, select 'No Error'. We must consume (1)/ a balanced diet (2)/ with a healthy body. (3)/ No Error (4)?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the following question, some part of the sentence may have errors. Find out which part of the sentence has an error and select the appropriate option. If a sentence is free from error, select "No Error". A balanced diet is one that provide (1)/ an adequate intake of energy and nutrients (2)/ for the maintenance of the body and good health. (3)/ No error (4)?

1 Answers 5 Views

AhmedNazir · Accepted Answer · 2022-09-04T04:29:57+06:00

Option 1 : In many foods, the natural combination of proteins with other nutrients makes those proteins more usable by the body than are proteins added in protein supplements.

Option 1 is correct, as it provides a proper explanation as to why we must consume a diet that has all nutrients. Option 2 is a fact that does not have anything to do with the argument, as is option 3.

Hence, option 1 is correct.