Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. None is strong.
  2. Only I and II are strong.
  3. Only II and III are strong.
  4. Only I is strong.
  5. All are strong.
5 views

1 Answers

Option 4 : Only I is strong.

We first make sure to read the statement carefully and then see what immediate inferences can be drawn based on our first reading. The next step is to look at the arguments given in the options, analyze them and see if they seem relevant with respect to the information/data provided to us. Finally, it is very important to study the question closely.

Following the aforementioned steps, we must analyze the given statement and the corresponding question closely. The statement is about the increase in the customs duty for various appliances and the possibility that this might lead to an increase in the local productions of premium goods.

In the question, it is asked which of the following arguments weaken the question asked thus, we must work accordingly.

Argument (I) correctly weakens the given question by stating the fact that the increase in the import charges will not result in the local production of premium goods, rather, will support Make in India, thereby decreasing the imports and producing the goods within India. As it weakens the idea that local productions will not occur rather ideas and initiatives will be carried out in order to strengthen productions within the country which will not be local productions of the premium goods.

Both arguments (II) and (III) are narrow as they have a limited perspective of either the up-coming festive or demand of A.C.s in the forthcoming summer season of 2019 respectively. As there are more factors also involved and other goods also which are not covered in these two arguments. Thus, these two arguments are weak in weakening the given question and can thus be rejected.

Thus, the correct answer is option 4.

5 views

Related Questions

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. Statement: A healthy diet and exercise are important for a healthy lifestyle. Arguments: I: Yes, eating healthy and being more physically active helps in maintaining a healthy weight. II: No, besides these two components, there are other components too which lead to a better lifestyle.?
1 Answers 8 Views
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: The government is working on a plan to set up a waterway freight corridor to connect the mainland with the northeastern states via Bangladesh at a cost of Rs 5,000 crore. The move would substantially reduce the time taken to transport goods to the eight northeastern states and costs.  Which of the following support the idea that the time of transportation will be reduced between the eight northeastern states Arguments: I.The proposed 900-km waterway would be used to transport freight from the northern and eastern states to the northeast and would start near Haldia in West Bengal, go to the Sundarbans, merge into the Padma river in Bangladesh and then join up with the Brahmaputra in Assam.  II. Currently, highway connectivity to the northeastern states is patchy and transportation of goods by road entails a high cost and takes time. According to the ministry’s estimate, the waterway could help reduce the cost of transportation by about 70%.  III. The government is already developing a waterway along the Ganga river between Haldia and Allahabad (1,620 km) at a cost of Rs 4,500 crore. This link will also be utilised for trade between India and Bangladesh.?
1 Answers 6 Views
In the question below, a statement is given, followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the suggested course of action logically follow (s) for pursuing. Statement: Led by a strong response to its first super sports utility vehicle Urus, Italian sports car maker Lamborghini is likely to more than double its volumes in India by the end of 2019, a year ahead of its plan, and cross the milestone of 50-60 vehicles per annum. The company, which began deliveries for Urus in India in September, said the vehicle is already booked for the coming six-nine months in India much like the global markets, and it will help Lamborghini get new. customers into its fold. Courses of action: I. The company is planning not to increase the price of its vehicle despite significant rupee depreciation and wants to protect the attractive price of Urus for prospective buyers.  II. The super sports utility vehicle will drive volumes, super sports cars such as Huracan and Aventador will grow by 8-10%. The company feels an 8-10% growth in the segment is a realistic expectation in spite of the challenges.  III. More than 68% of Urus buyers are first-time Lamborghini buyers and makers are sure that this will have a positive rub-off effect on the super sports car segment too.?
1 Answers 4 Views
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: World’s largest beer maker Heineken NV, the majority partner of United Breweries with Vijay Mallya, is understood to have sought legal opinion over its right to appoint a chairman at the Indian company. Heineken and some of its advisers believe that the shareholder agreement between Mallya and the beer giant has become null and void after India’s Enforcement Directorate attached his shares as part of its legal action against the liquor baron. Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner Arguments: I. UBL has stopped sharing confidential information with Mallya and has said that he is no longer privy to any strategic developments.  II. The board of UBL, India’s biggest beer company, had asked Mallya to either step down or appoint a nominee after the Securities and Exchange Board of India barred wilful defaulters from holding key board positions last year.  III. The company is functioning well and operations are in good shape but it is not good corporate governance to have an acting chairman for so long.?
1 Answers 7 Views
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: Automatic teller machines (ATMs) remain a mainstay of India’s financial inclusion drive and need the central bank’s support to stay relevant amid the government’s push for digital payments. Digital payments haven’t kept pace with the requirement for financial services in far-flung areas and a lack of ATMs there could prove disastrous for the economy.Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner Arguments: I. There is still strong demand for cash and if banks do not invest in the ATM infrastructure, especially in rural areas, people might opt to hoard cash instead. II. To maintain a balance between the two modes of payment, there is a need to open up regulatory sandboxes for ATMs to allow manufacturers to collaborate with financial-technology startups. III. Demonetisation pulled out over 85% of the cash in circulation, forcing people to embrace digital payments. Since then, cash in circulation has reverted to its pre-demonetisation days but digital payments have come to stay. ?
1 Answers 5 Views
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong' arguments and which is/are ‘weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement:  The central government has told the Supreme Court that anti-adultery laws were required to protect the ‘sanctity of marriage and the institution of family', and any attempt to do away with these laws would hurt ‘Indian ethos'. The government was responding to a court notice on a public interest litigation which wanted the law struck down as it was not gender neutral and the provisions were tilted against men. Which among the following arguments support the above statement regarding the ‘revision of such laws' in the best possible manner Arguments: I. It seemed to suggest that women were chattel owned by men and could be guided and misguided. II. This would erode the sanctity of marriage as an institution and the societal fabric. The issue of making the provision gender neutral was already pending before the government. III. Any step towards decriminalising the offence in the interim would be detrimental to Indian ethos which gives paramount importance to the institution and sanctity of marriage.?
1 Answers 4 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below are followed by two arguments each numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the two arguments is the strong argument and which is the weak argument. Statement: In a competitive market, if one firm reduces its prices then should other firms also reduce their prices Arguments: Yes. If the other firms do not reduce their prices, they would lose customers. No. The other firms will start facing losses by reducing their prices.?
1 Answers 5 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below are followed by two arguments each numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the two arguments is the strong argument and which is the weak argument. Statement: Can the Government provide housing facilities to the homeless Arguments: Yes. The Government can do anything and the homeless cannot get homes without the help of the Government. No. The Government does not have enough resources to provide for the housing facilities for such a large number of people. Instead the Government should build homeless shelters.?
1 Answers 6 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below are followed by two arguments each numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the two arguments is the strong argument and which is the weak argument. Statement: Should the Indian Government withdraw the subsidies on LPG cylinders considering a portion of the population can afford to buy unsubsidised cylinders Arguments: Yes. Subsidising cylinders leads to its misuse. By not giving subsidies on cylinders, the Government can save a part of its income and spend it on other more productive uses. No. Withdrawing subsidies on cylinders would make them too expensive for the poor and the middle class income groups and they would eventually turn to unsustainable means for household uses leading to pollution and ill health.?
1 Answers 5 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below are followed by two arguments each numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the two arguments is the strong argument and which is the weak argument. Statement: Should water be privatised in India Arguments: I. Yes. Private sectors are more efficient than public sector which would lead to improved water distribution. II. No. Privatisation will make distribution of water profit centric which would increase the cost of water. Not everyone would be able to afford water at high prices.?
1 Answers 5 Views